Laserfiche WebLink
SiAFF REPORT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> VABIANCE /31-f17 <br /> nere: auly �3. i987 <br /> Applicant: Joe and Alice Ba<er <br /> 1824 Colby <br /> Everett, WA y8201 <br /> I,ocation of Property: 1824 Colby <br /> Variance Requested: From E.M.C. 19.16.030, Lot Width, to <br /> alloW a bou�dary ]ine �d�ustment that <br /> xould reduce the width of the lot from <br /> 50 feet to 45.5 feet. <br /> Ezisting Zoning: R-2, Single Family High Densit�� and <br /> B-t, Neighborhood Business <br /> Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence <br /> Ad�acent Land Use/Zoning: North: Single Family/R-2 <br /> South: Single Famlly/B-1 <br /> East: Single Family/R-2 <br /> , West: Single Family/R-2 <br /> Exhibits: � <br /> 1. Vicinity/Zoning t4ap <br /> 2. Site Plan <br /> 3. Narrative Statement <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1. That there have been exceptional or eztraordinary circumstances or <br /> conditiona applying to the sub,ject property or as to the intended use <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> FindSng: The Baker's property consists of a single family structure <br /> on Lots 20 and 21 of Block 329• The parcel size is 50 feet by 110.05 <br /> feet and contains 5�502.5 square feet. Abutting to the north is Lot <br /> 22 oaned by Ralph and Burdina Larson with a single family structure <br /> that is less than one foot from the north boundary line of Lots 20 <br /> and 21. <br /> The Larsons, owners of Lot 22, wish to purchase four and one-half <br /> feet fYom the Bakers in order to provide adequate setback for their <br /> house from the property line. The Larson's property is 27.86 feet by <br /> 110.05 consisting of 3,066 square feet and is norconforming for lot <br /> size, lot width and setback. The propused boundary line ad,�ustment <br /> Would make thelr property less nonconforming and the Bakers would <br /> still be conforming for everything but lot Width. There is an <br /> existing portable shed in the rear yard that will have to be moved to <br /> meet the required five feet side setback, but there is ample room to <br /> do this. <br /> Conclusion: There are unusuol circumstances applying to the proposed <br /> use of the property that do not appiy generally to other properties <br /> in the same vicinity and zone. <br /> � r' <br />