Laserfiche WebLink
� � ;�qt'���P�y". <br /> ' � ° � 4 } '4 7 < .4 <br /> i ' t.�i�'"z+i�,}' at� � � _ - � , . '�a , .r <br /> 4{3. ' � ' _" ' <br /> i <br /> .. . _ � � L�j��i <br /> - I�. :x ' � ' • . - , � ` i . <br /> � � . . �wif r"" <br /> ;r'% .._ . . . - . ' r Fg _ <br /> - . ' . . . i,.� ��'� r <br /> � F <br /> . . : "_ <br /> ._'—___'_ _.__-_' .. . ._'__... ..__ � . . r � <br /> _ .. . _—._. --'a <br /> �� <br /> - � �G"'t'-'� , <br /> NovemUer 17, 1975 �-�'� � „ , <br /> ��� � <br /> ��� <br /> tft� Er�-r.r�-er. <br /> Tr�st Department ��rroF <br /> Gverett Trust and Savings Banl: <br /> 2S17 Colby Avenue everett <br /> Everett, lvashington SHZO�. :eo� osnes.ms�.eie� <br /> }� EYEqCTT, WASHIN6TON <br /> ✓Car Sll�s• P8101 <br /> (IqE OCPAqTMENT <br /> 1VC 1V1S}1 LO Call yOl1T attention t0 a letter fTOID Y111S • �EINOT�FI�lCIIM1ef � <br /> office datel April Z3 , 1975 calling for clemolition of <br /> the fire damaged buildin� at 2525 Colby and subsequent letters <br /> requesting and granting time extensions suUject tc the placing <br /> of safety barricades and the securing of the building against <br /> entry. <br /> 1'he building was to remain secure until such time that demol.i- <br /> tion was completed . On \tovemUer 14, 1975 i,�e �oere told that <br /> the Uuilding was being occupied Uy a contractor on a lease ar- <br /> rann,ement. At no time xas tliis office co;itacted concerning <br /> ' ttie occupancy. The contractor iras not made a�.�are of the let- <br /> ters nor the fact that the building was scheduled for demoli- <br /> tion. It would seem that Lverett Trust and Savings Aank is <br /> assuming an excessive de£ree of liability in granting occupan- <br /> cy in a Uuilding that ivill not meet any standard for an <br /> occupsncy permit . <br /> Further, the removal of the fire escape from tlie Goldberg <br /> building i��ithout provision for replacement is anoti�er question- <br /> able matter. The Fire Safety Code cicarly states ::hat ttao <br /> means of egress must be provided aUove the first floor with an <br /> occupant load greater than 10. Installation of single station <br /> smoke detectors is in no way a suUstitute for tlie required <br /> second mcans of egress . <br /> N!e suggest to you that should you need advice oi• assistance in <br /> fire safety related aiatters---and it appears that you do- -- " <br /> this ofFice is prepared to offer that type of service. A <br /> brief const�ltation prior to making decisions sucli as tliese ca�i <br /> ]telp a�•oid creating unwitting Code violations and/or fire safe- <br /> ty hazards . <br /> � <br /> i; � � <br /> ��r�t�:���;,y,/. �.�-� <br /> l;alter EL Cooper <br /> Fire Atarshal <br /> l�'IiC/r a <br />