Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � I <br /> , ; <br /> 5. Compatibility of proposod structures and improvements with surtoundUig propertles, � <br /> inciuding the stze, height,lacation,setback and arrangemant of all proposed buildings and � <br /> facilftfes,espec1a113•as they ralate to!ight and shadow Impacts on more sensftive land uses <br /> and less fntenstve zones. <br /> Findlag: The�ntenna's are to be located atop an existing midrise tower in the urban core. The <br /> huilding height is well below the 200 feet a1lov:ed by the zoning. The antenna units and supporting <br /> stnicture are quite smail compared to the slze�f the building on which they are mounted. <br /> Conclus(on:There will be no light and shadow impacts resulting from the project. <br /> 6. The number,stze and Ioca4ion of sign+,espoclally as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> Findfng: No signs are proposed. <br /> Conclusion:There are no signage related .mpacts. <br /> 7. Tho landscaping,buHering and screening of buildings, parking, loading and storage areas, <br /> especially as they relete to more sensittve land uses. <br /> Findfng:The improvements wiil be located on the roof top of a multi-story building. The r,ew <br /> antennas will have the same visibility as the existing antennas on th(s building. <br /> Conciusion: There will be nu visual or parking impacts on surrounding uses. <br /> 8. The generatlon of nuisance frritants such as nofso,smoke,dust,odor,glare,visual blight or <br /> other undosirablo Impacts. <br /> � Finding: The improvements are in excess of 100 feet above street level, negating the potentlal for <br /> � any undesirable impacts. <br /> Conelusion: No noise, smoke,dust, odor,glere, visual blight or other undesirable impacts are <br /> anticipated as a result of the proposal. <br /> 9, Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use <br /> desfgnafion in which the property Is located. <br /> Finding: The properly is designated as Centrel Business. The proposal fs clearly secondary to the <br /> principal office tower use. <br /> Conclusion: The use is consistent wlth the General Pian. <br /> 90. Compliance�vith the provisfons of this Ordinance and ather City, State and Federal <br /> re�ulations. <br /> Finding:The appiicant is in the process oF obtafning necessary Ciry permit,and is responsible for <br /> obtaining with all other required approvals. <br /> Conclusion: The proposal wili comply with the provisions of the Cily's Zoning Code and the <br /> applicant must obtain any required State andlor Federal permits. <br /> �11. Accessibil(ry to publlc transit,and treffic reduction measures proposed by the applicant to <br /> reduco do�endence of the proposed uso on the automobfle. <br /> �3 <br />