Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> ��"' : .� � , � � � � � � � <br /> . . • Dece:nber 19. 1979 <br /> r _ . . <br /> � Moved .by Councilman Gipson, seconded by Councilman Baker, �that the . - � <br /> developer be required to repair the sidewalk and curb and pave the <br /> ' . alley .from the south end of their pYoperty to the new portion� im- . ' <br /> � proved by Washington t4utual. • � �. <br /> ' President Aldcroft suggested eliminating the alley paving until such � � <br /> ' . time as 'an L.I.D. could be established. ' . � ' <br /> t4ayor Moore asked to be excused at this ti^�e. � • � � - � <br /> . . � <br /> �oll was called with Councilmen Overstreet, Baker and Gipson. voting � . <br /> yes, and Councilmen Langus, Pope, riichelson and Aldcroft voting no.,., .,-•- _; � I <br /> , . . ' . t�.i�.� � I <br /> . " . � � - � ' � . .' �.J G" � . i <br /> � . - Motion. Lost . ,• �, r„-,_ <br /> ' �. � 1. ' •. , . • . . . . . - . ..� i:":.'•i:P��.. <br /> Moved bx Councilman Aldcroft; seconded by Councilman Pope; 'that the " ''%�': <br /> developer of the parking lot at 3116 Colby be required to repair the �. :��'�" <br /> curbing and sign a Power o£ Attorney for other improvements at so�e �� <br /> future time when the property is being developed. � <br /> � _ . <br /> Roll•was. called with all Couticilmen voting yes, �xcept Councilmen. ' '. - <br /> Overstreet; Baker and Gipson, who voted no. . � <br /> ' Motion •Carried . . • • ` . � <br /> ORDINANCE 555 APPEAL -"'(CB''7912=537) �� , , . . ^ � <br /> Mr. Warren, said that Mr. E. J. Farrell, of Graybar Electric, proposed <br /> . • to construct a 5400 square feet addition to an existing warehouse in . <br /> the 3700 block of Mcrougall. Througli the S.E.P.A. revietv process and <br /> ' .the� City street improvement ordinance- 555-78, street impr.ovements <br /> were required in conjunction with the proposed expansion of ihe Gr.aybar � <br /> ' ' Building'. • Mr. Farrell requests that the. requirement of pavin the <br /> alley, installing curb, gutter and sidewalk on McDougall and widening <br /> McDougall be waived. Alternatives are as follows: . • ' <br /> 1) Waive requireioents of Ordinance 555-78 and Decl:ar.ation o£ • <br /> Non-Significance without any change to existing public - " <br /> improvements as requested by applicant and require Power of <br /> Attorney. • <br /> 3) Require installation of sidewalk and curb and P.O.A. f.or. ' <br /> ' zemaining improvements. � . . • <br /> • . 3) Require alley iinprovements now and Power of Attorney for <br /> sidewalk and curt.. .�_ . <br /> ' 4) Require standard ai-nlication of public improvements, in- ' ' <br /> cluding alley, s'ideualK and curb as required by L•he De- � <br /> claration o£ [don-Sicrnificance a'nd Ordinance 555-78. ' ' <br /> � . . ' . ... .. r�% I <br /> Dloved by Councilman Baker, seconded by Councilman Langus, to deny the^< <br /> appeal and require compliance with Alternative #�t as recommended �iy • <br /> staff. <br /> Roll was called witli all Councilmen voting yes, except Councilman Gipson <br /> and Preyident Aldcroft, wtu voted no. <br /> i�lotion� Carried . . � ' <br /> . <br />