My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3120 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
COLBY AVE
>
3120
>
3120 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2017 10:06:13 AM
Creation date
1/27/2017 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
COLBY AVE
Street Number
3120
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIT�OF EVERETT - BOARD OF ADJUSiI•SEIvT <br /> ORDER <br /> wHEP.EAS, thereto£ore , there was filed with the City of <br /> Everett Euilding Division on (Date) January 24, 1977 an <br /> application for a variance of Section No. 22.060 of Everett <br /> Municipal Code Chapter 19 by (applicant) S9illiam Hulbert <br /> (address) 1200 Bloc;;: Norton Avenue, Everett, WA 9II201 <br /> for (specific variance requested) <br /> Permission to build a proposed eight (B) story building and allow <br /> a twelve (12) foot side yard setback rather than the code require- <br /> ment of twenty-three (23) feet. <br /> Also from Section 19.22. 060, Yard Requirements, Paragraph C for <br /> permission to build to the rear property line rather than allowing <br /> a *wenty (20) foot setback as required by the Code. <br /> on the following described property: <br /> Lots 23 , 29 , 25 and South 1/2 Lot 26 , <br /> B1ocY. 736, Plat of Everett <br /> Address: Approximately 3120 Colby <br /> Zoning: R-5 Core Area Residential <br /> AIQD: WHEREAS, (Date) I•'ebruary 7 , 1977 was fized as the date <br /> of hearing on said application and proper notice having been given <br /> as required by law, <br /> AND: WHEREAS, a pub.lic hearing was 1',e1d on said date and the <br /> Board of Adjustment, after reviewi.ng all testimoty, made the find- <br /> ings that: <br /> 1. There are exceptiwlal or exiraordinary circumstances <br /> applying to the subject Property a, to the intended use <br /> thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties <br /> in the same vicinity or zone. <br /> 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoy- <br /> ment of a substantial nroper.ty right of the, appcllant <br /> nossessed bI the rnaners of other properties 9.n the samc <br /> vic:.nity or zone. <br /> 3. That the authorization of such variance wi.11 not he material.ly <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injuiious to property <br /> in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> 9 . That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect <br /> the comprehensive general plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.