3220 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

i , �' � � � i I I BOARD OF ADJDSTMENT � FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AHD ORDER (Variance i11-85) Based upon the srritten request for a variance from the City's zoning code, specifically 19.42.040(C) and 19.�10.020� made by Robert Trosvig and Greg Hanson at 3z20 Colby� hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the Board of Ad�ustment� folloxing a public hearing on said application held on June 3, i 1985� and further having reviewed all testimony� makes the following Findings, , Conclusions, and Urder: FINDINGS AND COWCLUSIONS: I 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or ' conditions applying to the sub,ject property or as to the intended use �, thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same , vicinity or zone. , a. Findln8: The lot ia located in the fl-5 zone and is 100 feet x i 110 feet. The applicant is proposing to build a new dentall elinic of 3,97j square feet; 944 square feet area will be used � for lab� employee lounge and deck. There is a total of 16 on-street and off-street spaces available at this time. b. Conclusiom The five spaces for r+hich the applicant is � requesting a variance would be for parking for the lab� lounge � , and deck. I � 2. That auch variance is necessarp for the preservation and enjoyment of all substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. , ' I i a. Finding: Soth doctors average 3-1/2 days a week with 55 to 60I patients. There are four employees per office. Washington State �i � average is !0 patients per Week. II b. Conelusion: Both doetors� average patient load is belowl � Washington State average. 3• That the authorization of such variance �+ill not be materiallyl; detrimental to the public welfare or in,jurious to property in thei vicinity or zone in which the property is located. a. Find�: The applicant is providing 78 parking spaces andj the:re are eight additional on-street parking s�aces. b. Conr,lusion: Hased on the proposed use and available on-street parking, this use aill have no de�rimental effect on aa,�acent property. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the , Comprehensive General Plan. a. Findin8: Ths Comprehensive Plan sl�owa this area as Core , Aesidential. b. Conclusior.s Tl�is variance will have no effeet on the Comprehenaive Plan. _'_ 1065F I �