3302 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

,- � � , BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER JOHN GARBE V - i23-84 33 Q� �Q~�' September 19, 1984 Baeed upon the vritten requeat far a Variance from the City's Zoning Code, epecificallq E.M.C. 19.42.040A and 19.40.020, made by John Garbe at 3302 Colby Ave., hereinafter referred to ae the "Applicant", the Board of Ad�uetment, following a public hearing on said application held on September 10, 1984, and further having reviewed all teatimony, makee the following FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. That there have been eaceptional or extraurdivarq circumetances or conditions applying to the eubject property or as to the intended uee ehereof that do not apply generallq to other properties in the same niclaity or zone. Finding: The applicant o�+ns a parcel oE property c+hich ie located at ' 3�� olby Aveaue which is a corner lot on 33rd 6 Colby. �Piie applicant's property ie 50' % 110', 5500 sq. ft. , vith a single familq reaidence which xill be removed to conetruct a nev office building. The R-4 zone allovs medical and professional offices. Both 33nd Street II and Coiby Avenue are AO' R.O.W. The front yard area is Colby and the side yard area ia 33rd Street. Being a corner lot, ie requiree a 10' � eetback on the aide yard ad�acent to 33rd Street. The requlred parking for the proposal is 21 spacee. There is exceea R.O.W. on 33rd Street that could be used for angle parking which would add a total of eight (8) more on-etreet parking epacea. Conclueion: The applicant's property does contain conditions that ciake it difficul[ [o maintain the 10' side yard aetback and parking requirements for the size of the building propoeed. 2. Tha[ such variance is neceaeary for the preservation and en�oyment of a aubetantial property right of [he appellant poeseeaed by the ocmere of other propertiee Sn the eame vicinity or zone. Finding: The applicant's property ie located in the R-4 zone. The range of uses allowed in tha[ zone ueually require larger lot area. Conclusion: Deneloping an office building on the 50' X 110' corner lot !e very difficult. 3. That the authorization of auch varSance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or in�urioue to property in the vicinitg or zone in vhich the property ia located. . Pinding: The variance reqnested would be a 5' variation and would be adjacent to a 80' public R.O.W in which a portion of that R.O.H. will be ueed fo: parking. Conclueion: Thie variance would not be injurious to 33rd Street. 4. That the granting of auch variance vill not adveraely affect the Comprel�eneive General Plan. Finding: The Compreheneive Plan ahowe thia area ae Multiple Famlly Residential. Conclueion: This variance will not effect the Com�reheneive Plan. _ i I + � '