Laserfiche WebLink
a benefit to business and to the community and allow her to make her �l��eli- <br /> hood at her home . That the granting of the variance would not only b� �iot� <br /> materially detrimental to the public welfare or in�urious to property ia <br /> this vicinity or zone, but it will be an �xtreme benefit to the community <br /> or all users of the services appealant will perform. <br /> The �nial of such variance would bring about much hardship to the <br /> aPP�lant or applicant as she has diligently worked toward her goal of creat- <br /> ine an Answering Service and has expended money for equipment and has <br /> procured many users . <br /> The adfustment and/or variance� it�ranted � would not constitute a <br /> grant of special privilege inconsistant with limitations on other properties <br /> in the vicinity and zone Sn which the sub�ect property is sitvate � because <br /> of the extremely limited services of this nature . '� <br /> An Answering Service is necessarily confined to the room in which it <br /> is conducted and is unknown to the surrounding vicinity of the outside <br /> world . i <br />