3530 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

. _ � � � . �i �_�.,,�,L� .— C'r-..._--...-:`C� � (��-,........._�F<2:.,� ! � L�,� J� ?'o� l:a�! c,s-. ��L.. � f �e�..Y� � q tt�t ti�� d :�l �lj'j� � / �.-cc _C.. .-..� � �f� ��''" � v 7a...,t- -...�..-. raoM Reid jK� ✓ �� r�•,.:�.` �J ,`[' �. . ( 1 _� onre August B� 1977�(� a�� RUG 1 ^ 1977 � -� " � �:,..: i sue�mr POSSible Chdnges n crrros cvcaerr, cvrer.r^�-ntiiw��ror� i Construction Permit Application CITY OF EVERETT E,,,;. , ,:t. , I On August 4 a representative of the First United Methodist , Church was requesting a building pe::ruit for construction I of a parking lot at the intersection uf Hoyt Avenue and 36th Street. This 99 space lot was being reviewed by the staff through the SEPA review process with August 16th as the last day for review and comment. This creates a problem. When tlie applicant originally came in he was unaware of the need fc�r any type of envi.ronmental review due to a lack of reference to S£PA in the Construction Permit. It would seem that if you amended the permit application to include a section on SEPA (see attached) it would alert the counter personnel of the potential need for some type of environmental review prior to issuing a building permit which would make it possible to run the environmental review concurrently with the plan review. Unfortunately this is not the only time this problem has arisen and in this case as in the others, in order to expedite matters, we allowed building permits to be issued before the comoletion of the SEPA review. Some other concerns were expressed by Dennis in regards to the lack of basic zoning information provided on the permit form. For example, there is no area in which the applicant is required to list the current zoning or other landuse � decisions as they relate to his specific parcel, i.e. , Special Property Use Permit, `.7ariance,Shoreline Permit, Rezone. This will aid your staff by alerting them to possible Planning Commission conditions. Another area of concern is the actual completion of the existing form. We have been updatiny our land-use map based on building permit information and often times notice a discrepancy between the legal description and the job address on the permits. This makes it very difficult to locate the various building activities. Also, if the retail uses could be br�ken down more specifically on the permits it would save staff time by eliminating the need for field checY.ing each of the general "retail" uses described on the application. „j�� H' — d��Cc�✓�",2u� a�u., .'�--F 1..qe _'/��in..l�cu.-�,�� '-� .,c„�e �,-i �� i `� u ��'.-C<Ci�{!w — ��-t N-B-«.,�i Q/?��tre.�`u�o -4 �C �a,cat' n,}'' c' . f��.- e�.:� .� �ru ,�ilm�t'� — >.!.� r. ,v..c,�sA e,�iic„f.c�c, '� /.:� (Cv JI �//� A u^" / � � �1C�uJ.f�l�/ . 4 '_ Y ll�i��t`�-'a.i. � �h% 4� .�3-pr.aa2e Z....<� ..eke� — ��,�.r // 7 X ,'i •-�itJ �74Y ��L, Q �C[.L`�iP -s�v+. - �5�� u� A!« a�t .�lr'�.LCcsc��. Q�J•'i �%�D�i��l�7'1(OX��4.e � Z �'/j///