Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> . <br /> BOARD OF ADJUSTMENi <br /> FTNDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br /> (Variance d28-85) <br /> Hased upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning <br /> code, specifically 19.20.050(B) side yard� made by Dr. Joseph Nelch at �1605 <br /> Colby, ye-einafter referred to as �'Applicant�^ the Board of Ad,justment� <br /> fotlowing a public hearing on said application held on January 6� 1986, and <br /> further having reviexed all testimony, makes the following Findings� <br /> Conclusions� and OrAer: <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br /> conditions applying to the sub�ect pe•operty or as to the intended use i <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone. I <br /> Finding: There are tuo elinics, one existing and one proposed on four <br /> (4) 25' X 120' lots. The apFlicants have entered into a mutual <br /> agreement providing a perpetual pedestrian easement between noted <br /> clinics. This will pcovide a covered entryway into both clinics. <br /> Conclusion: There ara no extraordinary physical conditions of the <br /> property. However, the intended use is someWhat unusual and is a <br /> exceptional circumstance. <br /> 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en�oyment of a <br /> substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of <br /> other properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br /> Finding: There has been no request as proposed by the applicant in the <br /> vicinity or R-4 zone. <br /> Conclusion: The variance request is reasenable and the ataff would <br /> support other requests if mutual easement agreements were provided. <br /> 3• That the authorization of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or 1n�urious to property in the <br /> vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> Finding: The variance request is a sideyard variance between txo <br /> proparty owners that are constructing a common entryxay. <br /> Coneluslon: The variance Will have no effect on ad�acent property. <br /> 4. That the granting of sueh variance will not adversely affeet the <br /> Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> Finding: The Comprehensive Plan shcWs this area as multiple family. <br /> Clinies are allowed in multiple family zones. <br /> Conelusion: This pro,jeet will have no effect on the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> � ROUTING <br /> � Gi" LARRY (0 ❑ M5.DENT � {';7 <br /> I [}-DOUG - ��JACN IJ� OL I j �( � � U` � `�' � D <br /> UU <br /> � �N:ALDO �� � FREU _ JAN 1 O 19B6 <br /> [,�IVORM � � �UNICE <br /> �BRIANj J�� � �SUE .........................._..._. _ _.._....._... <br /> CITY OF EVERETT <br /> �� ri LE Peb;ic Werks Dec.. • <br />