4310 COLBY AVE 2018-01-01 MF Import

1 ►� �5 �„ � . �� the variance becausc of the ten feet of property that would need to bc decded to thc City. Thcir house would havc to bc moved if the road iaas developed. Also the additional tra�fic that four new houses would create would bc detrimental to thc neighborhood. . i Therc �aas no further comment from the audience . After visually viewing the subject property and considering all. the facts and testimony, it was moved by Mr. Hoagland , seconded by , �fr. Zook, and unanimously carricd to deny thc applic�ant ' s request as the square footage per lot is too short and the variance request does not meet all the requirements of Section 19 . 70. 0G0 of the Everett Municipal Code , Paragraphs 1 , 2 , 3, and 4 . A hearing was held on the application of Visscher Builders 4708 West Vie�� Ilrive , Everett , 14ashington 93203 , for a variance from Section 19 . 42. 020 of the Everett Afunicipal. Code , Pences , Yaragraph C for permission to r_onstruct a rod iron fence 54" in height in the front yard rather than the code requirement of 42" in height. l.egal Description: Lots 28-32 Blocks 378 Plat of Everett Div. ��}3�� Address: 190G Colby Zoning : B- 1 Ncighborhood Shopping Chairman Russell disqualified himsclf at this time and gavc the chairmanship to �tr, Zook, Mr. Visscher represe»ted himself and emphasized he had sold the condominituns on scan•ity rc:�sons , .in�l his nced for a higher fcncc was for this re�son. 7'hcrc �,�as no objection from thc audicncc . After visually vicwing thc subjecY propet•t}. and considcring a11 the facts and testitnony, it was mo��ed bv Dir. lloagland , seconded b�• �ir, Zock and unanimously carried to �rant the variance as it meets all thc reqiiiremcnts of Section ] 9 . ;p, p�,� oC thc Gverett Municipa ] Code, Paragraphs 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 . � At this timc item four of the a � i �,cnda iaas continucd . 7'his request wa; Cor reduced parg.ing Por a propose� �loctors clinir ' 7ocated at 43rd and Colhy. r � � (�ei•i•y Crvine of t�he Planning Dep.u•tmcnt mnde thc announcement t!�;�t � the environmcntal checkJist has not becn revicwed by the Planning � Department and moi•e timc is needed. Hc sugFested a thirty-day � postponement. ! 'I'he Chairman of thc l3oard stated thc Board would t�ke this undcr z considcration , bu t t h c y i��o u l d p r c f c n c�;iring all thc testimony ;ii�,l then perhaps rrn�lcr a dccision.