Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />L <br />D. <br />� <br />Finding: Thie propezty takea access off Colby Avenue. Moet <br />dwellings in the area have garages off the alley. <br />Conclueion: The variance is not necessary for preservation of a <br />property right given [he fact that most dwellings in the north end <br />have garages and carporta off the alley. <br />Public Welfare: The authorization of the variance will not be <br />ma[erially detrimental to the public velfare or injurious to <br />property in the vicinity or zone in ahich the property ie located. <br />Finding: Moat dwelling unite in the areu are neat in appearance <br />and maintain a �niform setback from the street. <br />Conclusion: Sy allowing thie variance it would be detrimental to <br />the public welfare and injurio�s to property in [he vicinity <br />because the propoeed carport would not be in scale with other <br />dwellinge in the area and would not hold a uniform setback from <br />the street. <br />Compreheneive Plan: The grant�_ng of the variance will not <br />advereely affect the comprehensive plan. <br />Finding: The plans ahow this area ae a eingle family reeidential <br />area. <br />Conclusion: Single family characterietics ehould be maintained; <br />the granting ef the variance would not enhsnce those goale. <br />DECISION• Deny <br />Deny [he variance ae reqnested for the following reasons: <br />1. Thete are no extraordinary circumetances or conditions that appl.y <br />to thie property which do not apply to other propertiee in the <br />area. The applicant could build a carport in hie rear yard area <br />ae other property ownere in the area have done. <br />2. The variance ia not neceseary for preeervation of a property right <br />given the fact that moet dwellinge in the north end have garagee <br />or carporte off the alleys in the rear yard area. <br />3. The variance would be detrimentel to the public welfare and <br />injurioue to [he properties in the area based on the fact that the <br />ptopoaed carport would be out-of-scale with other' dwelling unite <br />in the area and would nok hold a uniform setback from the etreet. <br />4. The granting of this variance would not be in keeping vith the <br />eingle family characteristice of the neighborhood, th?reby no; <br />meeting the intent of the comprehensive plan. <br />VOTE: <br />Mr. Hoagland: <br />Mr. Wilson: <br />Mr. Zook: <br />Mr. Barnett: <br />Mr. Miller: <br />L <br />FOR <br />x <br />X <br />X <br />AGAINST ABSENT ABSTAIN <br />X <br />X <br />1��-�?-�, � h`�"-+�-�-�^f <br />Chairman, Board of Adjustment <br />� <br />�� <br />� � <br />