Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br />The applicant states that the proposed sign would in no way <br />obstruct any of the neighbor's signs or businesses. The City <br />provided writte�t notice to all property owners wi[hin 300 feet <br />of tlie subject property and no comments were received. <br />b. Conclusions: Tl�e proposed variance should not be materially <br />detrimental to the neighborhood area or the City as a���hole. <br />Criterion No. 3: <br />That the variance will only grant the subject property Uie same general <br />rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as [hc subject <br />property. <br />a. Findin s: The applicant states that �3�ithout the sign being <br />allowed on the existing pole there is little visibility to the <br />public, which in tum does not give d�e tenant, Your Secret <br />Fantasy, the same allowances as the neighboring Uusinesses, <br />wltich l�ave their si�ns located almost on the opposite proper[y <br />line. <br />All along Evergreen Way there are numerous businesses that <br />have freestanding signs. Many of these signs do not meet the <br />current zoning setback requiretnents. <br />b. Conclusions: The granting of the variance would pemiit the <br />subject property the same rights enjoyed by other properties in <br />the area. <br />Criterion No. 4: <br />That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property <br />the general rights described in Criterion 3. <br />a. P'indin s: See Criteria #3. <br />b. Cm�clusions: See Ciiteria #3 <br />3 <br />75 <br />