6408 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

� �� Celia ( October 18, ].978 6408 Everyreen Way - Requirement for Street �� -�� --- � �� Improvement Fronting Cycle Shop Development On SeptemLier 18 a Right-of-Way Use Permit Application was receivedo The sketch attached to the nermit indicated that the developer intended to asphalt the front of the property and install angle parking on Evergreen Wayo Tne permi.t was denied and on September 21 the permit application was returned to Building Department cvith a note indicating that the Evergreen [•7ay improvements per City Council direction, would be required. (Copies of specs for �vergreen ��ay were provided.f it should be noted that the development required 11 parking stalls, and with the propcsed oosition of the building on the site, the parking requirement could not be satisfied. 1t should also be noted that Public Works�at that time�had not received the SEPH Checklist for review. The SEPA review began late afternoon of September 21 and was compleced and returned to Plannin� October 2. The SEPA requirements from Public t9orks (per State Law) subjected the proposal to: 1. No vehicle access to Fleming Stzeet. (Note: The proposal does not abut Fleming, the requirement is to avert any future right of access to the residential street. 2, No sales or vehicle demonstration activities on property abutting Plemingo 3. Evergreen t9ay Standard Improvement required. 4. Streets to be kept clear of dirt and debris during construction. 5, Compl.iance with Drainage Ordinance. Final Declaration of Non-Signifi�ance is attached. Oi1 about pctober 3 or 4, Mel Hoerzle came in to discuss Right-of-Way Use Permit and the Everqreen Flay Improvement Requirements. Ancther set of Evergreen Way Specs were provided. Also discussed was the aiiyle parking and several alternatives for Froviding adequate parking were tossed arouna. It was decided by Pir. Hoerzle that the best alternative would b=_ to move the building to the front of the site and to place the parking in the backo The new arrangement presents a problem for the deve'.oper in that the 5uilding (prefab) had already heen ordered with tne entry to serve customers parked in front. Tlie new site laycut only provides 15 fes'' of clearing for 2-way on site traffic flo�v�which is rather skimpy. The l.S feet iG less thaa required for f.ire access to the building because of the side parking, It oras determined that since the building is fully accessible from the street that 20 feet caas not required.