Laserfiche WebLink
Tim Tyler I <br /> From: Tim Tyler <br /> Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 9:54 AM <br /> To: Jim Iles <br /> You may remember we talked about this one before. <br /> Tenant Improvement buildinp pertnit. The general contractor is in titipatton with the tenant overihe contrad to perform <br /> the carpentry woAc,which is completed. Actually the tenant completed the woric themselves. <br /> Upon completion of all the work[ceipentry, eledrical, and plumbing]the city issued a temporery Certificate of <br /> Occupancy. <br /> The tenaM would Iike a pertnanent one. Question. Could the city luue a permit to the tenant for the caipentry work, <br /> which could then be flnated and Gosed? Then a CO could be issued. <br /> The last contacl with the peneral contrador was in June when he asked that his permft not be ftnaled. The IRlpation is <br /> over the cost of the Job. He put a Ilen for more money than the contract and now the tenants ha�•e flled suft to remove <br /> the Ifen as trivolous. <br /> Thanks, Tim <br /> ��p "�-O `fi1�')1�l,c.. 1 � I�-/ � <br /> I � � <br /> � �j� �i TL� G � � �'1 � <br /> , T-t �� � s <br /> �, ��Zt�1 Ssv C `�'° <br /> � � �. v <br /> � <br />