Laserfiche WebLink
This finding is borne out by an examination of actual mortgages <br />executed within the affected census tracts of the Control and <br />Study Areas, as well as real estate listings at the 1000 -foot <br />level <br />Using mortgage and real estate listing data we find that, while <br />consistent with the Census data findings, the disparities were <br />more acute. Average mortgages at the tract level were 527,872 vs. <br />$21,605 in the Control and Study Mea tract clusters respectively: <br />At the 1000 -foot level, real estate listing values in the Control <br />Areas dropped to 516,038 while Study Area listings increased by <br />approximately 10 percant over the average mortgage value in the <br />tract clusters of the Study Area. <br />It would appear that, while property values at the tract cluster <br />level are appreciably higher surrounding the Control Areas, <br />housing within the Study Areas themselves is, on the average, of <br />distinctly higher value than housing stock in the Control Areas. <br />TIME SERIES ANALYSIS RESULTS <br />During the period 1979 through 1982, mortgages procassed in the <br />Control Areas of the study showed an average annual appreciation <br />rate of +24,7 percent. Ouring the same time frame, mortgages <br />appreciated at an average annual rate of only +8.7 percent in the <br />Study Area. In comparison, residential mortgages in Center Town- <br />ship appreciated at a +16.7 percent average annual rate for the <br />period. <br />AVERAGE MORTGAGE VALUES <br />1979 - 1382 <br />1979-1982 <br />1979 1980 1981 1982 $ Chancre <br />Control Areal <br />$16,038 <br />$21,687 <br />S22,650 <br />$28,420 <br />+ 77; <br />Study Areal <br />23,823 <br />25,432 <br />30,364 <br />30,090 <br />+ 26: <br />Center Township2 <br />16,100 <br />17,178 <br />18,903 <br />25,099 <br />+ S6; <br />l.Sourcn:lndianapolls Multiple Listings for Residential Prop. <br />2.Sourct:Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Statements. <br />E VER00040 <br />29 <br />