Laserfiche WebLink
in terms of their location, adult entertainment uses have continued an historical tendency to <br />concentrate in specific areas. Over the last ten years most adult entertainment establishments <br />have continued to concentrate within a few community districts in Manhattan. However, within <br />that period the number of community districts citywide with seven or more adult entertainment <br />establishments nearly tripled, from three to eight. Between 1984 and 1993, the number of adult <br />bookstores/peep shows/video stores increased citywide from 29 to 86 establishments, Within <br />this category, 74 percent consisted of adult video stores, none of which were noted in the 1984 <br />survey. Adult movie and live theaters continued to decline from 48 in 1984 to 23 in 1993. <br />Topless and nude bars increased by 26 percent in the same time period, from 54 to 68. <br />Impacts Found and Regulations in Other Localities <br />Other jurisdictions that have studied the effects of adult entertainment uses have consistently <br />found that these uses have negative secondary impacts. This has been the case for large cities <br />(such as Chicago and Los Angeles), medium-sized cities (such as Austin, Texas) and small <br />villages (such as Islip, New York). Similar negative secondary impacts (e.g., a relationship <br />between the concentration of adult entertainment uses and increased incidence of crime) have <br />been found despite widespread variation in land use patterns and other local conditions. While <br />New York may differ from these other jurisdictions in certain respects, their experience with <br />adult entertainment uses is highly relevant to consideration of the need for some form of <br />regulation. Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have <br />recognized that, in adopting regulations, a municipality may rely on the experiences of other <br />jurisdictions that have determined that adult uses have secondary impacts. Relevant studies <br />from other jurisdictions include the following: <br />The Town of Islip, in Suffolk County on Long Island, prohibited adult uses from locating <br />in downtown commercial areas because they would produce a "dead zone" that shoppers <br />would avoid. Other government efforts to revitalize or stabilize these areas and attract <br />private investment would be impacted negatively. <br />The City of Indianapolis, Indiana, conducted national and local surveys of real estate <br />appraisers regarding the impact of adult uses on property values in middle-income <br />residential neighborhoods. A majority of the appraisers, seventy five percent, responded <br />that such a use located within one block of such a residential neighborhood would have <br />a negative effect on the value of both residential and commercial properties. <br />EVER00094 <br />