My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 2:25:37 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
6/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
901
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. STUDIES AND REGULATIONS IN OTHER LOCALITIES <br />Impacts Found in Other Localities <br />DCP reviewed impact studies from the following municipalities: Islip (Nl), Los Angeles (CA), <br />Indianapolis (IA), Whittier (CA), Austin (TX), Phoenix (AZ), Manatee County (FL), New <br />Hanover County (NC), and the State of Minnesota. <br />Islip, New York <br />The Town of Islip completed a study of adult uses in September, 1980.5 The study formed <br />the basis of new zoning provisions that allowed adult uses only in Industrial I Districts, by <br />special exception of the Board of Appeals. Adult .uses would not be allowed to locate within <br />500 feet of residential uses and public facilities, nor would they be permitted to locate within <br />one half -mile of another adult use. Islip proposed the one-half mile requirement to prevent <br />a concentration of sex businesses visible to the driving public, thereby hindering the creation <br />of a "combat zone." <br />By limiting adult uses to certain industrial zones, Islip proposed to prevent "skid row effects" <br />in declining downtown commercial areas. The proposal was expected to further other anti- <br />skid row efforts such as new public investment, the prohibition .of certain residential <br />conversions, and restrictions on new bars. It was also formulated to prevent "dead zones" <br />from developing in commercial areas. According to the study, these areas are avoided because <br />shoppers do not want to be associated in any way with adult uses, or have their children walk <br />by adult uses. <br />Citing its case study, Islip indicated that the main complaint about a given adult book store <br />is its proximity to an adjoining residential area. Other impacts included parking in residential <br />areas (store patrons may wish to "hide" their automobile from view by parking away from <br />the adult establishment). The study, relying on newspaper articles, indicated that another <br />impact is the reputed association of the adult book store operators with organized crime. <br />s "Study and Recommendations for Adult Entertainment Businesses in the Town of Islip," Department of <br />Planning and Development, 1980. <br />3 EVER00102 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.