My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 2:25:37 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
6/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
901
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition, caution should be exercised in making inferences using criminal complaints. Data <br />was collected for the limited purpose of identifying differences in criminal complaints <br />between survey and control blockfronts within each study area, not between or among study <br />areas. Differences in the number of criminal complaints between or among,study areas may <br />be a function of variations in population densities, or other factors for which no study <br />controls were established. Additionally, data was gathered for a single, limited period of time; <br />not for trend analysis. <br />In summary, it was not possible to draw definitive conclusiorLs from'the analysis of criminal <br />complaints. Land uses other than adult entertainment establishments, e.g., subway station <br />access, appear to have a far stronger relationship to criminal complaints. It was not possible <br />to isolate the impact of adult uses relative to criminal complaints. <br />Analysis of Property Assessed Values <br />For each study area, property assessed valuations were identified for 1986, 1989 and 1992, <br />and the percentage changes between 1986 to 1992 were noted for the study area, survey <br />blockfronts, control blockfronts, community district, and borough. The survey and control <br />blockfronts were compared using the data indicating the percentage changes. The survey . <br />blockfronts were also compared in the same way with the community district and borough. <br />The analysis of trends in assessed valuation relative to adult entertainment uses was inconclu- <br />sive. It would appear that if adult entertainment uses have negative impacts, they are <br />overwhelmed by other forces that increased property values overall, at least as measured by <br />assessed values. Even at the small scale of the survey blockfront, there is a wide diversity in <br />the assessed value trends ranging from an increase of more than 18 percent to an increase of <br />more than 200 percent over the period of analysis, strongly suggesting the importance of <br />other factors. The influences on assessed value that the city's assessors take into account are <br />numerous and include the sale prices of similar comparable properties adjusted for differences <br />in size, age, and location. While the total assessed values on the survey blockfronts may be <br />influenced to some extent by the presence of adult entertainment uses, demonstrating such <br />effects is very difficult. <br />In the two Manhattan study areas (Study Areas 1 and 2), the change on the control block - <br />fronts substantially exceeded the change in the assessed valuation on the survey blockfronts.. <br />Between 1986 and 1992, the total assessed valuation on the control blockfronts in Study Area <br />57 EVER00155 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.