My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 2:25:37 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
6/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
901
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Changes on Individual Properties <br />After determining that the rate of increase of the total actual assessed values <br />of the Eighth Avenue Study Blocks was less than the rate of increase for the Control <br />Blocks, we zeroed in to compare more closely the rates of change for the lots <br />themselves. After detailing each block, property by property, an overall figure for the <br />"social block" or the avenue considered with both its east and west sides, Is noted. <br />The assessed values of the tax lots on the Eighth•Avenue Control Blocks were <br />analyzed in terms of proximity to the location of adult use establishments; the purpose <br />of the exerci' <br />- - se. vvas tosee if there were 'any; regarding.the,aocation i of <br />establishments and the rates -of change. ' <br />The findings are shown below.,-ln: most..cases,'.the .rate of -changes -for. other <br />the <br />lots on blocks +were less than those with adult use establishments.";; Note that the <br />...... h . <br />tax' lots which have adult use establishments are ind'-ated by, bold type.: . <br />When there is a decline in the assessed value, and the Department of Finance <br />records indicate no change in the building class or size, we can assume that the <br />property owner had at some point filed for and been granted a reduction in the <br />property's assessed value though a Certiorari proceeding.. <br />--- - - --- There may be many reasons for a property's assessed value to- have changed <br />at a rate different than those of the rest of the block, or the general area. One cannot <br />automatically assume any one ..reason, such a -s --`the proximity 'of adult use <br />establishments. For -:example; the physical condition :of .the. property. _may. -have..:.:-_ <br />deteriorated, or the property may be at a location undesirable from the polnt.of,;view <br />of potential retailers. <br />While it may well be that the concentration of adult use establishments has a, <br />.._generally depressive effect on the ,adjoining properties;'_as'a:.statlstical matter we do <br />-not have sufficient data to prove or'disprove-this thesis.'A ri ay also be that .simply <br />the presence of adult use -establishments' is :subjectively. viewed: by 'assessors .as a -.- <br />factor that necessarily reduces the value of an property. -in short, assumptions may <br />Influence assessment. ' <br />Also included in the lists below are the actual uses --the types of stores or <br />restaurants, for example—for each property along the Eighth Avenue Study <br />blockfronts, from 45th through 48th Streets. We have tried to see If there is- any <br />pattern in which uses that one might .consider to be more compatible with an adult <br />use reveal a different rate of change in assessed value than other, less compatible <br />uses. <br />26 EVER00212 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.