2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet

Consultants' Final Report - Page 31 Although Property crime also rose, the increase was not significant. No significant change was observed at a "control" site, so the increase in Personal crime was attributed to proximity to the bar. Since analyses of crime 200, 500, and 1000 feet from 8112 Garden Grove Boulevard (the bar) show no comparable effect, the rise in Personal crime cannot be attributed to the bar alone. Rather, it must be due to an interaction between the bar and the adult business. 6) In May, 1989, a bar closed at 12889 Garden Grove Boulevard, approximately 1075 feet from the Hip Pocket. The before/after and test/control contrasts for this change are: In the subsequent year, no significant change was observed either in Personal or Property crime; significance not withstanding the change was in the opposite direction of what was expected. Part II crimes within 200 feet of the Hip Pocket rose precipitously and significantly. No change was observed at a "control" site. EVER00377 One Year Before One Year After Test Site 200' 500' 1000' 200' 500' 1000' Personal Crimes 2 9 13 24 2 13 9 26 Property Crimes 4 15 29 48 5 19 39 63 Part II Crimes 13 22 8 43 80 26 5 111 Control Site 200' 500' 1000' 200' 500' 1000' Personal Crimes 0 2 12 14 1 1 14 16 Property Crimes 5 11 39 55 3 13 44 60 Part II Crimes 7 8 7 22 7 8 13 28 In the subsequent year, no significant change was observed either in Personal or Property crime; significance not withstanding the change was in the opposite direction of what was expected. Part II crimes within 200 feet of the Hip Pocket rose precipitously and significantly. No change was observed at a "control" site. EVER00377