9407 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

Yes MayUe No (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface watcr runoff? ' ' 'y� (c) Alterations Co the course or flow of flood waters? (d) (e) (f ) ig) (h) Change in the amount of,surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or 3n any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of ilow of ground waters? Change in tlie quantity'of ground �aaters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? • Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leac}iate, phospha[es, detergents, katerborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? , (i) Reduction in the amount of water ctherwise available for public water supplies?. Explanatign ��a �vT ncL(/l4N . �ov-Q- S�%r�fcC'S (4) Flora. [dill the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species; or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and equatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Int_oduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenislunent of existing species? (d) Feduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Eaplanation: (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in Che diversity of species, or numbers oi any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, inseccs or microfauna)? (h) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered , species of iauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration ar movement of fauna? (,d) Deter3oration to e�isting fish or wildlife haUitat? Explar.ation: — — � X — — �- - — �— — — � — — -� � X — � r