Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />� <br />f " �` U r �„� '� ,,vw� r ►�%%la..��e�'„t�l �, � — <br />.� <br />, � <br />' �+s� � �-�,�s <br />Table 41. EST1 AT D CAPITAL COSTS �OR OFFSI7E <br />STORMMATER NTION FACILITIES [14] <br />ee�e.. ti.000 — — <br />3�MN fbrM! yM� �� <br />hdllt) arq. upcl . Stte 1�prove.ent� �� �. �t <br />Ia�Han �cm 10� �t� On1�n l�nd �nd ut111Het Cantnctlw� T�1 !/+eK 1Ht� <br />Cr�EEf RrmeA S7p 7.51 J25 pS 62 I.IM t,IM 7.700 �.tf <br />Y�nton lrwK# 77S �.t! 162 " 6E !1! 1.01� 1.7l0 �.ii <br />�. [IIR 7000. <br />!. Stunge 1n e.cefs ef per�n�nt pal ap�Nty. <br />Cost Estimating <br />Unit cost estimates for stoTmwater detention ponds in Montaanery County were <br />used by the SCS to develop a first-cut method of estin�ating �;osts of onslte <br />storm�rater detention facilities. A graphical presentation of the esti�ated <br />costs is shown in Figure 23. <br />�a.� "'' '' „�'' i,aoo ia,000 ioo,000 t,ne,eu <br />� k�� � OEtEMTIOM STOII�iE IOI.tl�E, 11� <br />� , <br />� Figure 23. Onsite stonm+ater detention pond cost curve, EMR 3000•[6]. <br />: <br />; Mu�n F�-�f A�c� u vr�+�F.2 '�f �'=- -tr� G.�r � <br />, s5 3o�ro <br />; � l•Z4> <br />! Ciry OF �l/E2ETT �2EG/pl/AL !-�TF�II?YOM f�ND �'ES <br />L '' <br />, <br />