Laserfiche WebLink
��� ���� ���� <br />Bellevue Business Park <br />Building "B" - Suite 101 <br />2000- 124th Avenue N.E. <br />Bellevue, Washington 98005 <br />(206) 454-7000 <br />;i City of �erett <br />I}isector of Public Works <br />3200 Cedar Street <br />, Everett, Washington <br />At�: Hugh Warren <br />gE: EVERETT BUSINESS PARK <br />Dear Mr. Warren: <br />Novenber 12, 197° <br />�,I���'��C�� � <br />G� �J <br />rJov 16 1979 <br />......._ <br />CITY OF EVERETT <br />public Works Dept <br />i, in �9 <br />I'"- * <br />/y� �. <br />� ��a�, � <br />�� s:}„ <br />Ed,��<qG�.l F"°I tl..Nr �as� <br />� n p� ��:+y c.d.- <br />err''' <br />Enclosed please find one copy of the final Declaration of Non-Significance for the sub- <br />ject project, one copy of my letter to Ms. Strong dated October 23rd, and one copy of <br />your letter to us dated October 31st. I have enclosed these itans for your review be- <br />cause we wish to appeal the decision of assigning our project with an address along <br />100th Street S. W. as stated in }rour letter. We are very strongly in opposition to <br />this, in that we feel that an Evergreen Way address is essazti.al for the succ�ss of <br />our project. <br />In }ro�x letter, you mention that there is a City of Lberett code which r�+�;res that a <br />street address be detexmined by the location of the front door or the main enlsance on <br />the street. In o� narticular situation, we originally anticipated having the main <br />park entrance off of��ergreen Way, but �.as forced to abandon that approach after re- <br />ceivia�g the final Declaration of Non-Significance. In that docunent, it was reconu�ended <br />to nc�t allow any access onto Evec'green Way fran o� project. The Ciry agreed with this <br />thinking and all access to E�er.green Way was prohibited. Th�s rnt only denied us the <br />access we felt necessary to obtain the identity for o� project and fut�¢'e tenants, but <br />fisther eliminated the chance for an Evergreen Way.address per yo�' interpretation of <br />the City code. On the other basis, we are presently platming to make the east en�y of <br />ois largest office building (Bldg. "C") as the main entrance to t1�at building. This �- <br />trance wou.Ld, in fact, face Ebergrem Way. Since the enti.r.e project is only going to re- <br />ceive one rnmbered addreas and the main office building entrance faces Evergreen Way, we <br />feel this c�lies with the interpretation of the City code. <br />Other considerations wa feel should be mentiorzd concerning this matter are, 1) as pur- <br />chases, we paid a preniinn price for tlus property due to its exposure on Ebex'green Way; <br />2) as owner/contr.actor, we are presently proceeding with the construction of approximately <br />' 150 lineal feet of street imprwanents along Ebergreen Way for the City's benefit. <br />