2815 FEDERAL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

FROM ASayor J�nderson Lawrence EricYson DATE rtay iz, i��l GITV OF EVERET�. EVERETT. WASHINGTON SUBJECT A�SERICAN ICE 14'dD COLD STORI�GP IiUILDING, 1971 I met with Mr. Barcott, tdanager of the 1lnericatt Ice and Cold Storage Company, on May 10, 1971, concernin9 the Inspection made by Pir. noughertY, the Electrical Inspectoz, on i�pril 13, 1971. Record of the Inspection is on file. rir. IIarcott reports the followina: idr. Dougherty went directly to the construction site which is the bullding to the rast of the Ice Plant facina California Street, and inspected the job without permission. V7tien tdr. Barcott did talk with Mr. Dougherty, he stal:ed that t�ir. Doughertv was very rude and abusive, although he used no foul or ohscene lanquage, and demanded that certain F.lectrical wor;- be included and other crork rejected which would require that it be redone. I�ir. Dougherty reports th� follovving: Mr. Lrickson reauested that he checY, the Arnerican Ice and Cold Storage Building for a violation o£ the City ordinance requiring a Building Permit before starting construction. �1r. Douqherty visited the job site and found the door open and entered which is standard procedure for inspectians at every construction job, Iie looked for workmen ko identi.fy himself. Pinding no one and no bufldiny permit, he inspected the new work and found electrical violations. fie "red tagqed" the work which means "rejected". fIe then went to the oE£ice, identif.ied himself to the receptionist and asked for the manager. The receptionist contacted th� manager and sent t1r. Dougherty to the manager's office. hir. Dougherty identified himself to rtr. Bar.cott, discussed the work, explained that he had "red taaged" some of the work. They both then visited the building where the worl: is being dane, whare :dr. Dougherty again exPl3ineci the corrections and informed '•ir. Barcott the work r.iust be done by a licensed �lecY.rical Contractor of tir. Barcott's choice. Iie eamlained t}!at he was rejecting the work to stop the owner from continuing to do incorrect work which would be requirediained the�variousipermits was to avoid unnecessary e:cnense. Ife exp that are required, gave him his business c.ard, and l.eft. t4r. Adams subr.�itted very sketchy dr.awings for a buildinq permi.t the last week in ?�pril, ancl on the sketches noted that there •,rere "no lights", and "no water". On �•7ay 3, 1971, he �vas infor.'ied the addition would require lights and possibly other electrical work in accordance �vith the Electrical Code, and that he should see YSr. Dougherty concer.ning the miniMum requirements befo7:e a permit could be issued.