Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUS7'!lI:NT <br />FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br />VARIANCE NO. 12-90 <br />Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's <br />zoning code by: <br />Charles Pancerzewski <br />P.O. Box 885 <br />Mukilteo, WA 98275 <br />hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from <br />3ec. 8 of the Zoning Code, side setback, rear lot coverage, ac- <br />cessory building lot coverage and bulkheads in setback areas, <br />to allow an addition to an existing structure that was iurmerly <br />used as a garage that has a zero (0) foot north side setback <br />instead of the five feet required by code. The north side of <br />the garage would be extended an additional six feet along the <br />property line. <br />on the property commonly known as: 3307 Federal (Lot <br />4, Block 785, Plat of Everett, Division H) <br />The Board of Adjustment, following a public hearing on said <br />application held on June 11, 1990, and further having reviewed <br />all testimony, makes the following Pindings, Conclusions and <br />��rder: <br />+j�"NDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br />�yterion No. 1• <br />Tha1: the variance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- <br />traurdinary circumstances regardinq the size, shape, <br />topcyraphy, or location of the subject property; or the loca- <br />tion of a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that <br />conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was <br />con�tructed. <br />%•- gindinqs: The ^ubject property consists of a single fami- <br />ly residence ann a detached structure on a 25 foot by 120 <br />foot lot. Both structures are non-conforming for side <br />setback since they were constructed in t!ie early 1900's <br />prior to our current zoning code requi=ements. <br />The detached structure is in very poor condition and ap- <br />pears to have been used as a garage at some time since it <br />has a garage door; however, it is apparent that it has not <br />been used as a garage for a considerable length of time. <br />The applicant is proposing to renovate the house and qa- <br />rage. As part of the garage renovation, the applicant is <br />proposing to put in a cement floor and a foundation on the <br />west that will be used as a bulkhead for a fill to make a <br />level rear yard. The structure will be extended an addi- <br />tional six feet to make a total garage length of 24 feet <br />to provide a more adequate space for vehicles and some <br />storage space. The six foot �axtension would have a zero <br />foot side yard on the north side the same as the existing <br />garage. <br />b. Conclusions: The unusual circumstances applying to this <br />property are the narrow lot width and the fact that there <br />are existing structures on the site <br />