Laserfiche WebLink
� ��� <br /> . __ � �,�y�,� � <br /> T�'- 8ick Thompson/Hayor Hoore /^� y <br /> Fr:on, ��tiugh WarL'Cn, DPW v �j� <br /> ��T� December il, 1978 <br /> � /,�� �' <br /> sue�ecr Drainage Problem, 8111 �. GL.Dl�tle� cirv oF cru��. r � 'i.�+�r*. �+'^siuncron j <br /> Pigeon Creek #2 (No � � <br /> He have revieved Mr. itorthrup's Problem and ooncur that the pmblem was there <br /> pzior to t2�e tima the home �+ae bui].t (1976). The developer of the Subdiviaion <br /> durinq construction of the plat altere�d thQ fla+ of the natural drainage channel of <br /> Piqeon Czeek A2 and confined the fla+ to a restrict.ed open trench, in 19f,�i <br /> the City �rough ite drninage program installed a 15" culvert along r. Glen Dr. <br /> with the pmperty amer providinq the material. At appmximately this seune <br /> ti�oe (1966) , the State was carrying out the develo�nt of Sit 526 includinq <br /> dr�inaqe, which combined rith the natural drainac�e from tha upper limits of <br /> the drainage besin dlfd aas ma�e than the 15" culvert, alonq B. Glen Dr. could <br /> handle. Prior Lo the davelo1miant of Hr. 1Jorthn�p's Property on the <br /> East side of E. Glen Dr, thrz overflow from tlie creul: would spread out <br /> across the vacant lots. <br /> There are three basic alternatives for handling the problem: <br /> 1. Do nothinq, which-r+ould let the creak continue to overflow and flood <br /> Atr, Northrup's homn with the possibility of large damage claim3 <br /> in the future. <br /> 7.. Enlarge and/or parallel the existi.ng 15" culve�t along E. Glen Dr. <br /> vhich would cost a siznble amount plus increase the possibility of <br /> additional flo«iing and damage down stre� where some of the facilities <br /> ure also of inadequate capacity. <br /> I3. Try and devc�lop a detention bnsin within the property adjacant to tlie <br /> I north side of SR 52G and portions of Lots N7 and ikf3 of the Plat of <br /> � Pvergreen Glen. <br /> i It is our rnnclusion that the m.,st exI�edient and economical approach at the <br /> present tirie would be to try t� obtuin property and develop a detention basin <br /> ! under Alterntxte No. 3, <br /> � We have ndvised Mr. ttorthrup of the alternatives and of the one we will <br /> j pursuo. In the meantime, 19r. tioYthrup has rec�uested an� }�cen Pmvided sandl�aq, <br /> I to protect his property as much ss possiT�le. <br /> � <br /> FIJO:i�/S19 <br /> � <br />