Laserfiche WebLink
To RoUert Royce, InspecLion Supervisor <br /> FROM Bradford N. Catfle> Assistant City Attorney-}�C� � <br /> onre May 23, 1977 �� ' <br /> suo�ccr 1G1$ FULTON cilv oF �vcr��rr, cv�nnr. �vnsHiracroia <br /> On Priday , 11ay 20th , I received a cnll from Jim Allendoerfer who represents Pcrcy <br /> Sherar, the past otivner of 1G18 Pulton, n9r. Sherur has recently sold the property <br /> to 117r. and Mrs . Ellis who would like to restere the premises to code compliance. <br /> Jim indicnted that the Sherars did not respond reusonaUly to the letters nnd orders <br /> from you and that the City ]tas the right to demolish thr, premises. His inquiry wus <br /> whether the City could put off awarding the Uid if the Sherurs pay our administrat:ve <br /> costs. He snid the Ellis' have said Uiey can have the house up to code in 60 to JO <br /> days - und, Uierefore, suggests delaying awarding Uie Uid for that period of time. <br /> I don't meun to interfere in your nrea of expertise so don't feel bound Ly my comments. <br /> I feel the request is reesonaUle, though, since we're dealing now with the Ellis' and <br /> not n4r. Sherar. Purther, eince the Ellis' are providing a specific timetnUle (mnximum <br /> 90 dnys) , I tltink the City is reasonably certain of getting some results; if nat, �ve're <br /> not out much but u short period of time. <br /> LasUy , since it would be simpler to thc City to liave the premises repaired than to <br /> hnve it demolished and go through Uie lien procedure, utc. , tc get our reimUurse- <br /> ment, it may rvell be in our interest to allow the Ellis' time to perform. <br /> � <br />