1725 FULTON ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

i � � i � I , , j I I � � � i HOARD OF ADJiJST!(EMP ! FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, 11ND ORDSR VARIIINCE NO. 33-88 � I � iBased upon the written request for a variance from the City's � ilzoning code by: ! John Arnestad ( 2701 iSth St. ; ;I Everett, WA 98201 i hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. j : 19.16.050 (C) , Rear Yards, 19.42.040; Rear Yard Coverage, andl i19.16.G40, Accessory Building Coverage, to allow construction of � ;�a carport that would have a one foot rear yard setback instead of the five foot rear yard setback for accessory buildinqs required ; by code, would cover fifty-two percent of the rear yard area iinstead of the fifty percent allowed by code, and would hava an ! accessory building coverinq twenty-four percent of the lot aren ; inatead of the ten percent lot coverage allowed by code for � accesaory buildinqa. i ion the followinq described property: ; The W. 40 feet of Lots 15 and 16, and the S. 4 feet of the � W. 40 feet of Lot 14, Block 357, Plat of Everett i commonly known as: 1725 Fulton St. � The Board of 1►djustment, following a public hearinq on said �� application held on November 7, 1988, and further havinq reviewed � :�all testimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusions and ! iOrder: ;I F IIDII/L l�� rr+rrrttgrONS; ! Cr.it.�rlon lb. 1• I IThat th�r� have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances � or conditions applying to the subject property or as to the in- . � tondad usa th�reof that do not apply generally to other � propertiea in the same vicinity or zone. � a. Findina: The subject property consists of a sinqle � family residence on an extremely snall lot, 40 feet by 46 � feet containinq 1,840 square feet. The lot is � nonconforminq for lot size and width since the code i requires a minimum of fifty feet of width and 5000 square � feet of lot area. jSince this property is nonconforming in so many ways, it � is difficult to make a determination as to the yard jorientations; however, the zoning code defines front yard I as the space extendinq acroea the width of the lot; therefore, the north side of the existing house which faces the alley is considered the front yard of this , proparty. i � The existing structure is nonconforminq for front yard setback (north) which is zero feet rather than the twenty feet required by code and for side yard setback which is approximately four feet on one side (west) and one foot on the other (east) instead of the five feet required by code.