3625 GEYER LN 2016-01-01 MF Import

I ' After visually viewing the subject property and hearing all the facl•s and ' testurony, it was moved' by Mr. Herg, secondecl by Mr. F3isse1l and unaninously carriecl to qrant the applicant's request in that the previous height vari-u�ce granted to Septc��ber 13, 1977 arxi extended to Sept�s 13, 1978 beoon�es null azrl void as it pertains to this application and this variance meets all the requirements of Section 19.70.060 of the EWerett Municip:l Code, Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4. �A hearing was held on the application of Tho�s I.a�mureux, 4730 Carlton a3� EVerett T+IA 98203 to reapply (first hParing 7-10-78) for a varianoe fran Section 19.12.050 E�emtt Afunicipal Code, Yard I�quirements, Paragraphs A and C for perniission to rnnstruct a nc:� resid�nce to within ten (10) feet � from the North oorn�r of the front of the hause and ten (10) feet frctn the � South wrner of the front of the house rather ttkin the code requisement of ' t�enty-five (25) feet fran the property line to the front of the house. � Also � ; petmission to build to within seven and one-half (7 �) feet frnn the rear pYr7perty line rather than the code require�mnt of twenty-five (25) feet. �. Iegal Description: Iats 1 & 2, Replat of Tract 51 of Plat of D3gewater , Address: Approx. 3625 Geyer iane � Za�ing: R-S Single Family Stiburban Residential • , Mr. �noureux represented himself and made the follv,aing statements: ; '• ! 1. Zhe triangular sl�ape of the lot restricts the atcnwit of buildab�e area. Z• Rhe proposed house is oriented ta,rards the view. � 3. Zhe area was platted yeazs ago and this is a recorded buildable lot. • II Rhe residences of 3601 and 3617 Upland Avenue objected to the grantinq of the variance for the following reasons: � 1. Detriimntal to the existing view. '-. IQt is too sn311 to build on and is not in oonformanc� with the area. After visualiy viewing the suhject property and hearing all the facts and � testimony it �tias m�ved by Mr. Russell, seccnded by Ah�. Kristiansen and tmanirtnusly carried to grant the applicant's request because of the shape and topography of the lot it kould appear to be ing�ossible to build anythinq � on the lot �vithout a variance beinq granted. A1�e the variance request meets all the requirements of Section 19.70.060 of the EVerett Municipal �e, Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4. -2- 1'