Laserfiche WebLink
., - <br /> 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION <br /> Our field study included excavating a series of exploration pits and a visual geologic hazard <br /> reconnaissance to gain information about the site. The various types of sed'unents as well as <br /> the depths where characteristics of the sedimenu changed aze indicated on the exploradon logs <br /> presented in the Appendix of this re>>ort. The depths indicated on the logs where condidons <br /> changed may represent gradational variations between sediment rypes in the field. Our <br /> explorations were approximately loc2.ted in the field by pacing from ]mown site features shown <br /> on the aforementioned site sketch. <br /> The conclusions and recommendations presented in tkus report are based on the 5 exploration <br /> pits completed for this study. The number, location and depth of the explorations were <br /> accomplished within site and budgetary consvaints. Because of the nature of exploratory work <br /> . below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field exploraticr.s is necessary. <br /> It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present between <br /> exploration holes due to die random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by <br /> past grading or filling. The nature and extent of any variatiors between the field explorations <br /> may not become fully evident until construction. If variations aze observed at that time, it may <br /> be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and ma.i:e appropriate <br /> changes. <br /> 3.1 Exploration Pits <br /> Five exploration pits were excava�ed with a trac}:hoe. 'The pits permitted direct, visual <br /> observation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in the e�ploration pits were <br /> studied and classified in the field Uy an engineer from our firm. All exploration piu were <br /> bacl.�f"illed immediately after examination of the sediments and recording our observations. <br /> Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification, as <br /> necessary. <br /> 4.0 SUBSUI2FACE CONDITIONS <br /> Subsurface conditions on the parcel were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for <br /> this study, visual reconnaissance of tl�e site and review of the geologic map of the Everett <br /> Quadrangle. As shown on d�e enclosed logs, the exploration pits generally encountered loose <br /> fill soils overlying glacially deposited, loose to dense, silty fine sand. The following :ecrion <br /> presents information regarding the geologic origin of site soils. <br /> 4.1 5trati;ranhv <br /> The geologic map of d�e Everett Quadraugle indicates Q�at d�e sediments beneath this site arc <br /> Part of �hc Vashon glaci,.l drift. Our exploration pits encounrered soils which we interpreted to <br /> consist nf recession;il o�t��ash sand and �vcathered lodgement till which are likely located just <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br />