Laserfiche WebLink
Ai,L�ATIONS OF .4PPLICAt7T <br /> POINT Z <br /> Under existing regulations, it is permissable to divide a tract into four <br /> narcels pro•✓iding minimum frontage, and square footage requirements are <br /> met. The subject tract meets all criteria for segregation in this regard. <br /> However, due to the narrow width of the tract (Lot 20) fron*in� Glenwood, <br /> it is not feasible to pro�iide parcel "D" xith access from that direation. <br /> The ob:�ious ingreas would be over Elms Stree:t� which ie a public, dedicated <br /> right-of-way, and contiguous to oarcel "D". We belie�✓e we have the privile�e <br /> of using this right-of-way as access, just as other lots are and may be seried <br /> with th=. same accese. <br /> ' POINT II <br /> We desire only to ma]ce sen,ible econonical :improvement of Lot 20 under existin� <br /> zonin�; requirements. The impro^ement and u�;e of the pre-er.istin� rigfit-of-wa,y <br /> would be a benefit to surrounding propertica. <br /> POINT III <br /> Denial of this variance rrould mean uneconomicil use of Lot 20 to the degree <br /> that a 3 lot segregation would leave, :or esch tract, an excessive and unusable <br /> deoth. <br /> —tic:� - <br />