Laserfiche WebLink
i _ <br /> Based upon a review of the above record, the following Findings of Fact and <br /> Conclusions hereby constitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing <br /> Exa mi ner. <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> 1. The Applicant is lhe owner of a residential lot at 6605 Glenwood Avenue, Everett, <br /> Washington thai is located at the northeast corner of the intersectibn of <br /> Glenwood Avenue and Gateway Terrace. He seeks a variance from the required <br /> setback standard of ten feet off Gaieway Terrace. The requested variance would <br /> reduce the ien-foot street side setback to five feet and allow construction of a <br /> 20' X 20' detached garage within the setback area. The resulting garage would <br /> be approximately five feet from ihe right-of-way of Gateway 7errace. (exhibit 1, <br /> staff report) <br /> 2. The subject property is zoned R-2, Single-Family Detached Medium Density. �n <br /> the subject properly is a single-family residence. (exhibit 1, staff report) <br /> 3. Glenwood Avenue is classified by ihe City of Everett as an arterial st�eet that <br /> carries a significant amount of traffic. Gateway Terrace is a residential street thai <br /> provides access to other developments in the area. (Ingalsbe testimony) <br /> 4. The properties to the north, south, and easi are zoned R-2 and are developed as <br /> residences. The property to the west is zoned C-2 (Glenwood Terrace abuis the <br /> subject property). (exhibit 1, staff report) <br /> 5. In lhe City of Everett Development Standards Table, street standards of ten feet <br /> are estabiished for R-2 zones. The Applicant seeks a variance in order for the <br /> detached garage to be consiructed. (exhibit 1, staff report) <br /> 6. The subjeci property, �, r,200 square foot lot, has access only off Galeway <br /> Terrace. Tl�e access to the lot would remain off Gaieway Terrace, but would be <br /> moved slightly to the west of the present access. (exhibif 1, staff reporf) <br /> 7. The subject property has been developed consistent with the R-2 zoning <br /> standards. The lot satisfies minimum lot area and width requirements. While the <br /> lot does not saiisfy the minimum lot depth requirement of 80 feet, this is not an <br /> issue relevant io the request for the variance. (exhibit 1, sfaffreport; Ingalsbe <br /> testimony) <br /> 8. There are varied types of garages in lhe vicinity of the subject property, and <br /> theses structures, according io ihe City, "appear" to meet setback standards. <br /> The Applicant presented pliotographs of yet another properly on Gaieway <br /> Terrace that has a detached garage similar to that as proposed. (see exhibit 8) <br /> Upon reviewing exhibit 8 and being informed of the location of ti,at structure, lhe <br /> 2 yl <br />