Laserfiche WebLink
� � ro <br /> � y <br /> i0 G . '. ..�.:i,4t`'�' <br /> C y i�.+. <br /> � � � ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH ` ```' `'`;r�: � <br /> � y ro �;::� . i_� <br /> EORT7'•SE�'ENTH STREET AND SWTH ALCEA A�'EtiCE <br /> ECERETT.\VASHI�IGTON 9N:07 <br /> zp �y �' .�� �� TELEPHOtiGI'06):i2.1{29 <br /> � H O <br /> , ; .�1�� <br /> � ;° R ' �' �� � August 11, 1992 <br /> � y �y ����� In Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner <br /> y � �h1 Hearing Examiner Decision. <br /> I� <br /> � o y City'of Everett, Washington p1blic Works Permit: 92-173 <br /> � t„ 1��' 3002 Wetmore Avehue <br /> '� Everett, Washington 98201 <br /> � � � : � <br /> Greetings: <br /> At a special meeting of the Church Council of 2ion Evangelical <br /> Lutheran Church, an educational and religious corporation, in- <br /> corpora[ed under the laws of the State of Washington, a quorum <br /> being present and voting, Pastor Brandt was au[horized to <br /> retain legal counsel and represent our collective thinking in <br /> the above matter. <br /> We hereby ap�eal the Hearing Examiner's decision, as substantial <br /> facts of evidence and points or law were not presen[ed in the <br /> hearing examiner's decision, nor did the Public Works Department <br /> j �` present accurate information in r.heir staff report. We <br /> �� submit the following: <br /> � 1. Mr. Stack did not present any evidence of his need/reasons <br /> for reqUesting a permit to build a fence (exclusive use) <br /> . ��� on 7� feet of city (alley) right-of-way. His application <br /> i <br /> ��� did not locate utilities, i.e. power, telephone, television <br /> • cable service, nor the sanitary sewer which runs north 6 <br /> south in the center of the 16' right of way. (2) He mis- <br /> represented the diminsions of his property and other per- <br /> I �►� tinent facts by omission from the application fozm, loca_ion <br /> of his proPerty line. <br /> 2. Notice of the public hearing examiner's hearing was not <br /> �1�a received by other property owners in the block, although we <br /> furnislied a list of the same to both Public Works & examiner. <br /> 3. On advise of counsel we have contacted two of the property <br /> �. N�. owners again and they furnish the attached statements co which <br /> ��� they have sworn. <br /> i 4. Hearing examiner did not speak to "exclusive use" question that <br /> the City Code: 13.30.010, as granting permit for "non-exclusive <br /> iI ,� use". This is not exempted in further section 13.30.040. Land- <br /> ` ��' scaping in use would be appropriated if this is granted vithout <br /> \ a plan far removal or compensation. Hearing examiner did not <br /> speak to a base line at the easterly edge of 4611 College (Stark <br /> property). The owner measured from the middle of the College <br /> Street improvement. This is not the way it is done. <br /> 5. Other concerns and matters have been outlined in our prevlous <br /> correspondence with interested parties. <br /> I (We) declaie under penalty of perjury under the laws oE the state of Washingcon (RCW 9A.72)rFa <br /> the foregoing statements of 36 lines are true and correct and that no thre , ises, <br /> or inducements have been made to me resarding this statement. ��s�`�i�G���i�tS�L�L�� <br /> 4634 SOUTH ALGER AVENUE • P.O.DO�C 2116 • EVERETT,NASHINGTON 9 '03•0116 � <br /> �Oy� <br />