4634 COLLEGE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

I I elue Bay Inc. Appeal Page -9- His [the Hearing Examinerj determination is limited to an administ�ative proceeding to determine whether or not a particular piece of property is subject to a county land ordinance. In the instant case, the Everett Hearing Examiner can only _� review existing ordinances of the City of Everett. Without specific legislation he cannot make a determination that it was the intenl of the City Council to allow merger of lots into a single parcel in order to determine the standards for building of lots within the City. The City undecstandably is concerned what impact this decision may have on other substandard lots platted and approved prior to adoption of the Zoning Code. As noted by the Appellant, many of these lots may have merged by construction. For those �hat haven't, however, legislation allowing automatic merger can be approved. This would allow control over future� • development and would adequately inform the public about rights of development of property. Done and dated this 3rd day of June, 1988. am� �1. f�F�� mes M. Driscoll The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing Examiner based on the authority 9ranted in Ordinance 692-80 as amended. It is final unless the following procedure is followed: 1. Any party aggrieved by the Everett Hearing Examiner ' s decision may file a written cequest with the Examiner for reconsideration within ten (10) working days of the date of the Examiner ' s decision. The request shall explicitly set forth alleaed errors of procedure oc fact. The Examiner shall act within ten (10) working days after the date of the filing of the request for reconsideration by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision or calling for an additional public hearing . If an additional heacing is called for , notice of set hearin9 shall be mailed to all parties of record not less than five (5) working day prior to the hearing date. The final date for requesting reconsideration is June 17, 1988 .