6907 COLUMBIA CT 2016-01-01 MF Import

2. Mr. Pignataro adcnowledged that it was impossible for him to develop the property or to impiement any of the Hparing Examiner's conditio�s. He indicated that his ercors are a result of being misirttormed at the time of the purchase of the property. Mr. Pignataro could think of no possible solution to the problem. CONCLUSION 1. The Hearing Examiner of the City o: Everett cannot grant relief to the property ovmer, Mr. Pignataro. Because of the legal inability to pursue a use variance or a short subdivision, Mr. Pignataro can on.y reconvert the additional structure on-site to a garage/racreation room. ORDER Based upon the preceding findings of facts and conclusions and testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, it is hereby ordered that the options as set forth in the November 3, 1993, decision are hereby withdrawn and tnat Mr. Albert Pignataro is given until August 19, 1994, to completa the recorniersion of the second stnu:ture on the subject property to inctude a garagehecreation room. The stn�cture may not be used aa an ofice or for residential purposes. Feilure to c:omoly will result in the City taking necessery legal adion to insure conforman�e with zoning and pertnit records of this property. Done and dated this 18th day of February, 1994. �i� �. �J,�� Jamea M. Driscoll Hearing Examiner