Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> ,� <br /> I <br /> �► � � <br /> ' I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> rublic Welfare: I <br /> � <br /> Finding: The atructure is 2300 aq. ft. , two-story, and the exista5 � <br /> dvelling is 1000 sq. ft.- tatal 3300 aq. ft. lot coverage. Groes floor � <br /> area ratio ie 3318 sq. ft. for thia lot. I <br /> . � <br /> Concluaion: The structure as built ie not in scale with the <br /> neighborhood and ia not an accessory use. Also, with the added <br /> carport, the area will exceed groea floor area ratio. <br /> I <br /> i <br /> Comprehenaive Plan: � <br /> Finding: The 1968 plan ahowe this area ae Single Family Reaidential; i <br /> the 1972 plan ahove thia area Medium Deneity Residential. I <br /> Concluaion: AlloWing a atructure such as thie to become a principal i <br /> building vould not be in keeping with the intent of [he comprehensive ( <br /> plan. � <br /> i <br /> COI9�fENDATION: DENY A VARIANCE IN THE R-2 ZONE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I <br /> The etructure ae built and vith the added carport, which ia needed for I <br /> parking, vill exceed the grose floor area ratio allowed for the R-2 <br /> zone. <br /> The applicant caueed his ovn hardahip and there are no exceptional o: <br /> Iextraordinary circume[ances that apply to thia property. <br /> The uee is not in scale with the neighborhood ae to height, bulk, ard <br /> grose-floor area ratio. <br /> p�; FOR AGAINST ABSENT ABSTAIN <br /> i <br /> r. Hoagland: R � <br /> r. Wileon: X <br /> r. Zook: R. <br /> r. Bazne[t � 1C <br /> r. Miller: 7C <br /> Chairman�oard of Ad,7ue� <br /> I <br /> . <br /> I <br /> � I <br /> � <br /> ; <br />