Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> i1 i � i <br /> I I '' <br /> I I <br /> I I <br /> C. Public Welfare: <br /> ;I <br /> r �I Finding: The atruc[ure is 2300 sq. ft. , two-story, and [he existng ', <br /> �� dwelling is 1000 sq. ft.- tolal 3300 sq. ft. lot coverage. Gross floor <br /> II area ratio is 3318 sq. ft, for this lot. <br /> �, Conclusion: The structure as built is not in scale with the <br /> Ineighborhood and is not an accessory use. Alsu, with the added I <br /> carport, the area will exceed gross floor area ratio. � <br /> ID. Comprehensive Plan: <br /> �� � <br /> Finding: The 1968 plan shows this area as Single Family Residential; <br /> II the 1972 plan shows this area Medium Density Residential. <br /> jl Conclusion: Allowing a structure such as this to become a principal � <br /> ; building would not be in keeping with the intent of the comprehensive � <br /> I, Plan. <br /> !LI � I <br /> �Iu:COMMENDATION: DENY A VARIANCE IN THE R-2 ZONE FOR THE FOLLOWING .RGASONS: I <br /> I� <br /> �1. The struc[ure as built and with the added carport, which is needed for I <br /> �,� perking, will exceed the gross floar area ratio allowed , for the R-2 <br /> Ij zone. ! <br /> ...... <br /> I�1 �......,..� I <br /> TLe applicant caused his own hardahip and there are no exceptional or I <br /> � cxtraordinary circumstances that apply to this property. <br /> i <br /> , <br /> 3. The use is not in scale with the neighborhood as to h=ight, bulk, and <br /> ;I gross-Floor area ratio. i <br /> I <br /> �VOTE: FOR AGAINST ABSF.NT ABSTAIN i <br /> IMr. Hoagland: X � <br /> �Mr. {lilson: X <br /> �fr. Zook: X � <br /> Ir. Barnett X _ ! <br /> �r. Miller: X , <br /> il <br /> �I � <br /> I� <br /> I �� �--���-�_ ' <br /> I I <br /> Chairman, Board of�us��nr ,� <br /> iI <br /> I�i <br /> iI I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> li <br /> i <br /> �I ' <br /> � <br /> 'i , <br /> �i <br /> r, <br /> � <br /> i <br /> '�j <br /> iI <br /> i J <br /> I <br /> i; <br /> i <br /> � , I � <br />