My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4944 ELM ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ELM ST
>
4944
>
4944 ELM ST 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2017 7:33:59 AM
Creation date
2/12/2017 7:33:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ELM ST
Street Number
4944
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�titer�on No. � <br /> That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoy- <br /> ment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed <br /> by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br /> a• F3D,diag� Other corner lots in this vicinity and zone have <br /> front yards oriented towards the length of the <br /> lot instead cf the width (see Exhibit 4) , and in <br /> the past the Board has granted variances in <br /> similar situations. <br /> b. Conclusion: Granting this variance will allow the Applicant a <br /> property riqht possessed by others in this vicin- <br /> ity and zone. <br /> Criterion No 3• <br /> That the authorization of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the <br /> vicfnity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> a• F.1II$1a4.;_ The six foot setback on the south would abut the <br /> side yard of the adjacent property and so would <br /> provide a similar setback that is t}•pical for <br /> other properties in that block. <br /> b. Conclusion: It does not appear that grantinq this variance <br /> would be detrimental to the public welfare or in- <br /> jurious to other property in the vicinity and <br /> zone since side yard typically abut and the six <br /> foot setback would be similar to a typical side <br /> yard setback. <br /> C:iterion No. 4• <br /> That the qranting of such variance will not adversely affect the <br /> Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> a. Findina: The General Plan designation for this site is <br /> sinqle family detached and the setbacks as pro- <br /> posed are typical of what is provided in this <br /> desiqnation since there is a qreater than twenty <br /> foot front and renr yard setback even though the <br /> setback is oriented towards what the zoninq code <br /> defines as side yards and the south setback which <br /> is defined by code as rear yard really functions <br /> as a side yard and is in keeping with the side <br /> setback for this desiqnation. <br /> b. Conclusion: Granting this variance will not adversely affect <br /> the General Plan. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the Hoard of Adjustment of the City of Everett <br /> does hereby order that the variance be GRaNTED to allow a six foot <br /> rear yard inRtead of the twenty foot rear yard required by code <br /> and further require the applicant t.o meet the following condition. <br /> 1. Tha Applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits. <br /> -Z- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.