My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1718 ENGLAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ENGLAND AVE
>
1718
>
1718 ENGLAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2017 8:44:50 AM
Creation date
2/12/2017 8:44:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ENGLAND AVE
Street Number
1718
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IGcotcchnical Enginecring Evaluation <br /> England Avenuc Lot <br /> � June 2, 2005 <br /> NGA Fiic No.411805 <br /> � Page 11 <br /> uphill side of the swcwre. The lateral pressure acting on subsurfacc retaining wzlls is depcndent on the <br /> II <br /> nature and densiry of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as <br /> � backfill is placcd, wall dr�i��ge conditions, and ihc inclination of thc backfill. For walls that arc frcc to <br /> yield at the top at least one thousandth of the height o(the wall (active condition), soi! pressures will tx� <br /> ( less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or br.icing (at-rest condition). Wc <br /> I recommend Qiat walls supporting horizonlal backfill and not subjected to hydrostatic forces be desigm d <br /> I using a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that exerted by a Fluid wiih :� dcnsity of 35 pcf <br /> for yieldino(active conJition) walls, and 55 pcf for non-yielding(at-rest condition) �valls. <br /> lThese rccommended laterd eartl� pressures are for a dmined backfill and are based ou thc assumption of a <br /> horizontal ground surface behind the wall for a distance of at Icast the subsurface height of the wall, anJ <br /> Ido not accowu for surch.�rgc loads. Addition,d latcral carth pressurcs shoulJ bc considercd for surch::,gc <br /> IoaJs ucting adjacent to subsurface walls and within a dis�cince equal to the subsurface height of the ��;�II. <br /> IThis would include the effects of surcharges such as Iraffic loads, Floor slab loads, slopes, or other surfxc <br /> IoaJs. Wc could consult with you and your stnictural cn�,inccr rc��arding additional loads on rctainine <br /> ( walls and dcbris walls during final design, if necdcd. <br /> IThe lateral prcssures on walls may be resisted by friction bct��e�n the found:uion anJ subgrade soil, ,md <br /> by p;�ssive resishuice acting on the below-grade portion of the foundation. Recommendations for <br /> � friction;d �md p;issi�c rcsist,mcc to lalcril lo,ids ,irc pr�scntcd in thc Foundations subsection of this <br /> � repurt. <br /> All w:dl b:ickfill should bc wcll compac�cd :�s uutlincd in thc Structural Fill subscction oF this report. <br /> I Care should be taken lo prevent the buildup of c�cess lateral soil pressures,duc to overvcompaction of the <br /> � wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in six-inch loose lif'ts nnd compactina it <br /> with small, hand-operated compactors within a distance behind the wall equal to at least one-half the <br /> Ihcight of the wall. The thickness of the loose IiRs should be lessened to accommodate the lower <br /> compactive energy of the hand-operated equiproent. The recommended Ievel of compaction should still <br /> Ibc maintaincd. Ne are av:�ilable to provide specific rctainim� �eall/,horing recommendations as the <br /> �rojcct plans Jc�'clop. <br /> I <br /> � NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.