Laserfiche WebLink
Subsnrface Erplorarion. Geofogic Hazard, and <br /> Everett Schoo!District Murnrenance Fncrlrry Pre(imiimrv Georechnica!Engineering Report <br /> Everet(, Wns4i�igton Desien Rarnmmo d �' <br /> � -- ...__..�.._._ <br /> ' The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the exQloration <br /> borings completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations were <br /> completed wiUiin site constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, <br /> extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be <br /> noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present duc to the random nature <br /> of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or tilling. The nature and <br /> extent of any variations bctween the field explorations may not becomc Cully evident until <br /> construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be neccssary to re-cvaluate specific <br /> recommendations in d�is report and make appropriate changes. <br /> 3.1 Exploration Pits <br /> Seven exploration pits ���rc cnmplcted by a subcontracted backhoc. All of the pits were <br /> excavated to approsimately 13 feet below tl�e existing surface. During the excavating, samples <br /> were obtained of r.��h distinct soil type in each pit. The samples obtaincd from the pits were <br /> classified in die field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples <br /> �vere then transpurted to our laboratory for further visual classi(ication �nd geotechnical <br /> laborarory testing, as necessary. The pits were continuously obscrvcd ;md logged by an <br /> engineering geologist from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are <br /> based on the field logs, excavation rates and action, and inspection of die samples secumd. <br /> l <br /> 4.0 SUBSURFt\CB COND["IIONS <br /> Subsurface conditions at du project site were inferred from the field e�plorations accomplished <br /> for dtis smdy, visual reconnaissance of the site, and a review of applicablr geologic literature. <br /> As shown on the ticld logs, the exploration pits generally encountered loose to medium dense <br /> fill overlying a deposit cunsisting of stiff to very stiff glaciolacustrine silt and medium dense to <br /> deise glaciolacustrine silry sand. The following section presents more det:iiled subsurface <br /> information organized from the upper (youngest) ro the lower (oldest) matcrial and sediment <br /> types. <br /> 4.l StratiQra� <br /> Fill <br /> Fill soils were encountered in all seven exploration pits excavated at the site. 'rhe fill was <br /> between 6 to 10 fcet decp. Generally, fill in the north half of the site was a mediuro dense silry <br /> sand with litde gravel and tr�ce amounts of cobbles and organics. This fill is intcrprered to bc <br /> derived from till soils. The fill encountered in the east side of the south half of thc site was <br /> variable in nature and ranged from medium dense silry sand to debris laden silts and loose <br /> C <br /> Mtry �' zC01 ASSOClATF.D F.iRTN SCIENCES, INC. <br /> JDCian-tiE01051A1-D:Ixyldil.R01-IY:h' Page 3 �\ <br /> V <br />