2715 EVERETT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

" . 114 � . • . . t•iarch 5, 1980 , , ' . SPECIAL PROPERTY USE PERt•1IT - (CB 803-101) „ j��'�� , .��.� , Gerry Ervine, of the Planning 'Department, reported that the Beth1ny�Y�' � ' Temple Church had made application for this permit in 1977 to const�uct a church whi,ch would have included a Fellowship Hall, classrooms, sanctuary and a aymnasium, but they did not meet the time constraints � ' which has caused a reviewal of this application. �Mr. Ervine stated that this proposal has some changes different from . the original appl�ication. The changes tahich were due to funding orob- lems include the elimination of a parking tower, decease in size of the structm-- itself and the elimination of the gymnasium. The proposal now is to allow construction of a 35, 000 sc7uare foot church o which will accommodate 1, 200 people. This facility would include a -� Fellot�ship Hall, classrooms artd a sanctuary in an R-9 multi-family n higfi density area. �• � . Councilman Aldcroft asked about the Planning Commission's condition n6 � � regardi�ng the payment of a sewer interceptor fee and Mr. Ervine replied � -i ' that the actual fee has not deen determined but could be approximately o m $2, 000. Couacilman Aldcroft then asked about condition #7 which states r�„� • there i13 be no access from• Everett' Avenue. Mr. Ervine said access to t his faci lity �vi l l .be from Ce dar an d Fu lton. ' . � m . . � z x -� Councilman Gipson felt that by closing the �,verett Avenue access it would '^ ,., cause coiigestion on Cedar considering there are other churches in the � Z ' area. � _ � � ' James 7ucker, of 2511 Fulton, spoke on condition $10, sayinq that the '` „ sidewalk would not match up with his and P1r. Ervine said negotiations �� � are being made with the church about the stand of trees and possibly -im 'the sicewalk may haye to meander. and then taper to match with Mr. Tucker' : m .-. • sidewalk. � o "' . o� Mr. Tucker said he was against� any additional� right-of-way taken from m �`"i+ him for the 'sidewalk and idr. Ervine said this may be necessary. Mr. � � Tucker then stated he was opposed Co anocher church in the area £eeling • a it should remain where it presently is. � A � ' Bob Butterfield', Architect, ' asked about an extension of time, referring Z . ' to condition �1 to one year from the effeative date of the special � . Froperty use parmit and construction completed one year later. _ � • N President Overstreet asked if a public hearing would be required if we o alter the Planning Commission's recommendations and Brad Cattle, City � • Attorney, replied that the changes were minor and in favor of the r�„ . applicant so a public hearing eoould not be necessary. Mr. Butterfield stated that it woulci cost an estimated $75,.000 to comply with conditions �6 and t;8 and the cl:urch cannot afford this as it is a non-profit organization. He asked for relief from condition #8 . � , . Councilman Langus asked if there was an alternative to n8 and Gerry Ervine replied that an overlay was possible but was unsure as to .what was uader the streets, _sec,�er lines, etc. Councilman Aldcroft suggested that those who made this decision. should address the alternatives and .ir. Butterfield said he was comfortable with that. Councilman Gipson requested that the traf'fic congestion Problem also be addressed. ' t�wr. r,�/�--r+.—.., c. .�� . 'r.--�•T—�r��w--r��v��-ti. -. .�R=r�T.�^.'�....'�`.'S'K.T`�+i:..1'G=F:; .�,I�_-�'��.'��.��r��iV.l �' ,� 1 .�t..�. �.�r��^"�v.�S'`J M�^�..�M�L 4?• y /�y T'��.3n^1f.�.w�i �:�lN��M:r't^ .� .MV�A�^�M`�p�QrI�Y��r /�_TIT��YR��A�V+�nx�r.I�{l�i�.(�"'�•��•i