Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> ` I <br /> �� Bob Landles, Planni�i��D�t,(,� ���� i <br /> : ���� i+'j,��C � <br /> i Public Works Dept.��_,�f' "' i <br /> II March 28, 1580 ___ _� _--__ I <br /> P.esponse to E ansen Letter Dated ' "` '� ' '' <br /> � January 11, 19 re Everett Mall Dusiness Parlc <br /> I I <br /> _____� � <br /> j South Broadway L.I.D. - ho problem with the conclusion reached. ! <br /> � SOOth Street L.i.D. - So that there is no misunderstanding, it should be pointed � <br /> i out that the L.I.D. will indude improvements to the iMersection of 7th Ave. S.E. � <br /> ; <br /> at 100th Street. <br /> I The 100th Street improvemeiit has been identified as a mitigation of significant � <br /> ' traftic impact upon the stre�t. The wiown benefits to the proposed development <br /> inciude safer vehicle and pedestrian usage and easier accessibility and convenience � <br /> I for emFloyees and patrons of the development. I <br /> ' Future NortirSouth Traffic Corridor L.I.D. <br /> ' The "AlternatIve Approach" paragraph provides the necessary elements to mitigate i <br /> � impact of development sheuld the "undependable" status of the current P.U.D. I <br /> j right-of-way access decay, exce t that: <br /> i <br /> � First, there is no provision .or continued maintenance of the P.U.D. access. <br /> ' Second, and most important, �vhen L.I.G. costs are assessed, those costs are I <br /> spread in accordance �vIUi the special beneiits that are corSirmed thereon CSchmitz � <br /> vs Seatile). In other words, it is desired that a covenznt be placed �n the property <br /> , that would prevent the property irom protesting the formation of an L.t.D. <br /> Whll� aY the same time, it is n�t desired to restrain any right� to protest the <br /> amount of the assessment hased on claims Uiat the property is not benefitted <br /> to the exteM of the assessment. ' <br /> The identified nced ior cor.tinuation of a maintained, Norti�-South uaffic corridor <br /> cannot be permanently guaranteed without requiring a no-protest covenant ' <br /> in the event the P.U.D. right-of-�vay is not available. <br /> No Recorded Document <br /> Either, or both, of the suggested alternatives would be acceptable to Public CVorks, <br /> I if Brad Cattle cletermines that they could be eniorced. Perhaps implementing <br /> both alternatives would be most effective. <br /> Sewer Interceptor <br /> � Forrnulas attached. <br /> ! CIS:is ' <br /> ' Attachment <br />