1019 SE EVERETT MALL WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

� ( ( ' Yes Maybe No (b) Changes ih absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? • X (c) Alterations r.o xhe course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Ciiange in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface watezs, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but net limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turUidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X �6) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addilions or withdracaals, or through intercepCion of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X (h1 Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or throiigh the seepage of leachate, phosphates, de�ergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, .or other substances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction ir. the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? • x Explanation: See Attachgd (4) Flora. 1di7.1 the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species; or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and equatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers. of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) In.*.roduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduct3.on in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ _ X Explanation; See Attached (5) Fauna. ldill the proposal result i.n: (a) Changen in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (Uirds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of uew species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the mig:ation or movement of fauna? X � (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? � X Explanation: None