Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Ron Gregory <br />IRONt: Doug Purcell <br />DATE: October 26, 1990 <br />RE: "Drinking Establishment" <br />Thz City of Everett has attempted to impose some additional requirements on the Olive <br />Garden Restaurant building resulting from a reference in the Everett Building Code to "drinking <br />establishment." <br />The question is whether the Olive Garden Restaurant constitutes a"drinking <br />establishment." <br />The simple answer appears to be that the Olive Garden is not a drinking establishment. <br />We have do�e a computer run on words drinking establishment throughout the State <br />Courts of the United States as well as research the law of the State of Washington. From a <br />statutory point of view, there appear to be three separate kinds of reCerences: "eating and <br />drinking establisnments," "eating and/or drinl:ing establishments" "eating establishments" and <br />"drinking establishments." <br />When used separately, the phrase "drinking establishment" appears to refer to what we <br />would ordinarily think of as a tavern or bar. I would particularly note the reference in Cole <br />v. The Colorado Sprin s Comp�, 381 P.2d 13 (Colorado 1963) to "saloons or other drinldng <br />establishments ...." Wallace v. Shoreham Hotel Corporation, 44 A.2d 81 (D.C. 1946) "a <br />drinl:ing establishment, whether called cocktail lounge, bar, saloon or some other name ...." <br />The Supreme Court of the State of Washington has recently addressed the question <br />somewhat more directly in Hieh Star. Inc. v. Liquor Control Board, 106 Wn.2d 455 (1986). <br />That case involved a question as to whether the Liquor Board had properly revoked a particular <br />estabiishments' Class H Liquor License. The basis for the revocation was a violation of certain <br />regulations which required that a certain percentages of gross revenues be attributable to food <br />sales. The court recited the hisrory of the regulation of alcoholic consumption in the State of <br />Washington since the repeal of prohibition. The two primary actions were the Steele Act in <br />1933 and the adoption of Initiative 171 by the electonte in 1948. The Steele Act established <br />the liquor store bottle sale structure and Initiative 171 estab'.ished Uie sale by the drink powers <br />and provisions. <br />