My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1321 SE EVERETT MALL WAY OLIVE GARDEN 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
>
1321
>
OLIVE GARDEN
>
1321 SE EVERETT MALL WAY OLIVE GARDEN 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2019 10:41:09 AM
Creation date
2/13/2017 7:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
1321
Tenant Name
OLIVE GARDEN
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Ron Gregory <br />IRONt: Doug Purcell <br />DATE: October 26, 1990 <br />RE: "Drinking Establishment" <br />Thz City of Everett has attempted to impose some additional requirements on the Olive <br />Garden Restaurant building resulting from a reference in the Everett Building Code to "drinking <br />establishment." <br />The question is whether the Olive Garden Restaurant constitutes a"drinking <br />establishment." <br />The simple answer appears to be that the Olive Garden is not a drinking establishment. <br />We have do�e a computer run on words drinking establishment throughout the State <br />Courts of the United States as well as research the law of the State of Washington. From a <br />statutory point of view, there appear to be three separate kinds of reCerences: "eating and <br />drinking establisnments," "eating and/or drinl:ing establishments" "eating establishments" and <br />"drinking establishments." <br />When used separately, the phrase "drinking establishment" appears to refer to what we <br />would ordinarily think of as a tavern or bar. I would particularly note the reference in Cole <br />v. The Colorado Sprin s Comp�, 381 P.2d 13 (Colorado 1963) to "saloons or other drinldng <br />establishments ...." Wallace v. Shoreham Hotel Corporation, 44 A.2d 81 (D.C. 1946) "a <br />drinl:ing establishment, whether called cocktail lounge, bar, saloon or some other name ...." <br />The Supreme Court of the State of Washington has recently addressed the question <br />somewhat more directly in Hieh Star. Inc. v. Liquor Control Board, 106 Wn.2d 455 (1986). <br />That case involved a question as to whether the Liquor Board had properly revoked a particular <br />estabiishments' Class H Liquor License. The basis for the revocation was a violation of certain <br />regulations which required that a certain percentages of gross revenues be attributable to food <br />sales. The court recited the hisrory of the regulation of alcoholic consumption in the State of <br />Washington since the repeal of prohibition. The two primary actions were the Steele Act in <br />1933 and the adoption of Initiative 171 by the electonte in 1948. The Steele Act established <br />the liquor store bottle sale structure and Initiative 171 estab'.ished Uie sale by the drink powers <br />and provisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.