Laserfiche WebLink
„,_ orr-a�3-'ari �3:1-t IL•:rtrY CtF E��ERETT TF1_ Nn:2oE-.,-,-,_�;:�� a��59 PO' <br />: . . .. �% . --� .. <br />� �{ n /�r * �7� ' <br />� j�1.�1,'�lJ1Z�i1\rllVi�t r�: <br />Ron Grcl,ory <br />October 2G, 1990 <br />Pa�e - 'l <br />Among the pruvisions of lnitia�ive 17i was the creation uf the Class H)icense which (s <br />the license applicable ttr restaurants and other food establishmenfs, A restaura��t is defined in <br />tt,e statute as follows: <br />'Restautant' as used ln 12CW GG.24,4U0 to 66,24,A50, inclusivz, <br />means an establishment p:ovlded with special space and <br />accommodationS where, in consideration of paymcnt, food, wlthout <br />lodgings, iS habitually furnished to the public, not including dn�g <br />stores and soda fountains: Provided, that sucl� establishments shall <br />be approved by the beard and that the boazd shall be satisfied that <br />such establishment is m�intained in a substarttial manner as a place <br />for preparing, cooking and Sen�ing of eomplete mea]S, The <br />service of only fry orders or such food and victuals as sandwichcs, <br />hamhurgers, or s�lads sha11 not be decmed in compl{ance �ti�ith this <br />definition. <br />xC�v 6G,24.410(2). <br />Tn referring to the Class T� Liquor License, the $G1te $uprcme Court of ��'a;nington <br />s�id: <br />Initiative 1�1 did not intend to turn restaurants tnto r�ni; n <br />establist,ments, bu! W permit tlrinl� !o be ser:ed incidental to iuca <br />service, <br />106 \Vn,1d 455, 465 (emp6tlsis arldeci), <br />The Sta[e Supreme Court has differenciztul "drink;ng e5�.�blishr,�nts” frorr� I4'SG.?UY"dtilS <br />and, under the cirCumStances, particularly in l;;ht of the statui zeason for lho dddilional cale <br />restrictions on "drinklnE establishments" (see at�acned), the Olive c;arden Restaurant should not <br />be included in the phrase "drinking establisP�ment." <br />6t1�C�W.m(E <br />�Mfl <br />