Laserfiche WebLink
T� <br />FFOM <br />DATE <br />SUOJECT <br />Tim Tyler, Building Official <br />Bruce E. Jones, City Attorney <br />October 31, 1990 <br />Chapter 38� UBC, <br />Fire Exti7guishing Systems <br />;_� _ <br />, ,..__ <br />�r , ,.. <br />�, ;.,. <br />��1.� � � � <br />f�10 V 1 1990 ��--'� <br />�CITY OF EVERETT �� <br />Public Works Dept. <br />CITY OF EVEREr7, EVERE7T VlASHINGTON <br />This office has received a memo from Doug Purcell, an attorney representing <br />Harmon and Assaciates who have questioned the applir,ability of Chapter 38, <br />UBC, Fire Extinguishing Systems, to a restaurant under construction in <br />estabiishment " mThis d�stinct�on, hovever, issnot d terminative a The�issue <br />is where and under what circumstances an automatic fire extinguishing system <br />is required in Group A occupancies. Section 3802 (c) states: <br />(c) Group A Occupancies. 1. Drinking establishments. An <br />automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used L•y <br />the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages ar,d <br />unseparated accessory uses where the total area of such <br />unseparated rooms and assembly uses exceeds 5,000 square feet. <br />For uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall not <br />be less than as required for a one-hour occupancy separation. <br />The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at <br />least a one-hour occupancy separation. <br />The requirement seems clearly to app]y to "... rooms used by the <br />occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages .. ""Drinkin <br />establishments" is the title of the section, but the title is not <br />determinative of its scope and intent. Spokane v. State, 198 Wash. 682, 89 <br />P.2d 826 (1939). It is my opinion that i t e restaurant in question has a <br />room to be occupied for consumption of alcoholic beveraye unseparated from <br />other uses and exceeding 5,000 square feet, then sprinklers are required. <br />If you concur as the Building Official, that 3802 applies to the plans <br />submitted to the City, and the applicant remains unconvinced, I suggest that <br />you inform Harmon and Associates of its right of appeal under § 204. <br />{0033) <br />