Laserfiche WebLink
Paul McKee <br />From: Heather Griffin <br />Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:42 PM <br />To: Paul McKee <br />Subject: FW: Everett Mall Exist 16" WM <br />Paul, <br />_'Y7 - regarding `�r.s ]C,° o-:a�:c: c,ai::. <br />iieather Gri�iin <br />925.257J206 <br />-----Originr, 1 :;e:�s.�ne---- <br />[7om: Jane Limn::rman <br />Sent: Thursday, October 14, �Or?4 ':;5 G:t <br />So: 'Robert Ashton' <br />Ce: iieather GrJ_Tfin <br />SubjecL: Rr: Gver�.tC .,rill. !'.::::cC �G�� C:i�i <br />iIi Robert - <br />SP:FA condition '12 is less � sLorm drainage issue than i[ is a �vuter issue - and HeaL`.r•:,c- <br />i.s the person who handles the drinking water side of things. B��t my understanding is :.;��at <br />�he 16-inch main is a critical component of the City's water system. Previous Mall <br />er.pansion plans included relocation of the water main, so the age and condition of the dzm <br />�.aas of much less concern to the City. Relocation of the main would he much preferred, <br />Lrom a vulnerability and a potential repair/replacement standpoint. However, reloc�,t:on <br />�aould be at the developer's expense, and the relocated main would need to be in a r�ublir_ <br />easement. <br />:f the 16-inch main will be '_�`1: in its current location, and Che berm/dam ���:]'. conti.n��:�.; <br />to seive as a water detaininq _�_.:ctarc, Lhen the be�-c�,/cia�n r�eeds to be brougtit uo Co <br />�._urrent dam sRTety standarci:�. <br />---���-, �.i i na: :�!:,:... _..,� �.--- <br />: ro�r.: .„�.� _ i Sntc�i� In �_ �Cc::.-�:,. i� �._�.'.i, . r.�iS:�.� _..-.:-:r�1 <br />.'��-nt: 'Phursday, October 19, 2009 11:; 0:,., � <br />:b: Jane Zimmerman <br />.���_:bject: Everett Mall Lsi.st 16" i9[�] <br />. .__ : �..c� n�ii_tion ��o. . n_nti o � _ tf-iat ; r.c �:-:ist_ng Beim (dam) must <br />in co��pli�nc� wiLh dam saPe�y sCandards. !dy qucstiai is: was this <br />-�3uirement inlue of relocation of the ex. 16" [9M? If so, one of the <br />.commendations from the geothech is that the south portion of the existin9 <br />�,.rm must be regraded at a min. 2:1 slope, this would impact the esist <br />�-�,'_ume, and this is of site than I believe extra permits will be required. <br />` the geotech illustrates that the proposed design of the north porticn of <br />.`��e Berm (vegated pond) and perhaps adding a liner, i:i_ll r:ot imcacc che Serm <br />:or the 16" [4M, will this s�tisfy rhe cities concec�ne ? <br />:±ubert Ashton <br />rashton@dci-engi.neers.co�a <br />;.^.5-818-1707 (D? <br />.:'';-F27_gq�� C�? <br />.._ ,-...,-;:o,..G <br />