Laserfiche WebLink
Cc: ?atrick Cor; <br />Subject: RE: Existiny Inter Urban Trail nasericnt <br />1 would recommend using Tom Grafstra (i25) 259-9149 <br />!thomy@sno�omishlaw.com) who i.s in Washingion and has wurked o�. the mall for 1ear=. :;e is <br />:�ery familiar with all legzl easements and entitlemenLs for the property. <br />Patrick and I are in agreement that since the original easement was bi-lateral, <br />iudemr,ifying each othe-, we should get the same pricilege. <br />Let's get a final draft to Mike and get on the 9/21 committee meeting. <br />By the way, the trail we are talking about will be open to the public in a fem��.aeeks, so <br />there shouldn't be any public outcry. <br />;:c did not buy the easement. Patrick has information regarding the transaction between u� <br />a;:d the PUD. F'rom what I understand, we bought encroachment rights upon their propercy co <br />do improvements to the land, <br />(ie: our parking field between SEARS and village :enter). Since construction began, �;r_ <br />ha�_ had to re-routc tne trail .nd sotnet�mrs close the trai� L�r a day hnre or. there. <br />Thanks, <br />.?a:nes Palda <br />Froject I,anager <br />Stead£ast Properties & DevelopmenC <br />20911 S.W. Bicch Ste.200 <br />Newport Beach, CA 92660 <br />949.852.0700 main <br />999,P52.0193 fax <br />NOTZCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The informaCion conr.�ined in this coRununication and a�y <br />attachments hereto are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to �ahom it <br />is addressed and others authorized to rereive it. It may contain confidential or legall� <br />criv�leged information. If you are not tite intended recipient, you are hereby not'_fied <br />ttat any disclosure, cop}�ing, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the <br />contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have <br />recei'�ed this communication in error, ploase nociLy the sender immediately and then deiece <br />this communication and any attachments. <br />---�--Originai Message----- <br />From: Mary Kelly <br />Sent: Thursdaf, August 18, 2005 9:98 FN <br />To: James Palda; Ana Marie del Rio <br />Cr_; patrick Cox <br />Subject: RS: Existing Inter Urban Trail :a�e�aenr <br />- spoke to Mike Palacios at the City. He told me that tne whole issue of th�� casement o-ras <br />orought to the City's attention by a user of the trail. They had closed part of it down <br />and caught grief from the users re usa of federal funds, etc. His concern is that if tha <br />sa::ement goes to council, some of these 'wildcards' may show up and real.ly slow the <br />proces:r down. He indicated the City was fine granting indemrification to other public <br />agencies, but private parties always had to go through the process. I told him Steadfast <br />had every intention of granting the easement, but we really did need to send it through <br />coimcil . <br />1!c has put us on the calendar for the Real Estate Committee's next meeting, which is <br />:.-;eptember 21. Once the committee approves the easement, it goes to council and thc publi,: <br />aets to comment. <br />: also told him I had some concerns about Paragraph 2(c) of the current easement re <br />_ndustrial Insurance and that i would need to have the easement reviewed by o�ar 47ashinato❑ <br />counsel, as I was unfamiliar with the law in 47ashington. I said I would try to get � <br />�avised draft of the easement to him by the end of next week so he had something cleen �o <br />cz;Fce tu committee. <br />Yic also spoke re extinguishing the current easement. He was under the impression that <br />.�,.�.�ad£ast had bouqht the fee inC�rest .in the currenc PUD easemeet and that uie could add <br />l.�nqur_��e to our ur.=,Pt tc �a::ti.�guis-h to cur_enC easetncnc. tIc t��ondcred �ahy iae hadn'c said <br />A <br />