Laserfiche WebLink
Paul McKee . <br />From: Jane Zimmerman <br />Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 7:00 Ah1 <br />To; 'James Palda' <br />Cc: Paul McKee <br />Subject: RE: Everett Mall Phase 2- letter <br />Hi James - <br />The letters indicate that there were no wetlands found on the 4.5 acre portiun, and that any hydric <br />soils or wetland vegetation associated with the detention facility area on the 1.5 acre site were <br />intentionally created from non-wetland areas. I agrea with those conclusions. <br />fiowever, the stream channel to the west of the detention pond dike, ider�tified as a Category III <br />stream in the 1°93 letter, is not addressed in the 1998 letter- and would, I believe from the <br />infonnation in the 1993 letter, stili be classified as a stream. If I remember correctly, the facility that <br />Reid-Middleton had proposed, that was referred to in the 1998 letter, would not have extended the <br />"footprinY' of the pond beyond its current westerly edge. <br />Howe�er, as I said in our meetiny, I am not the person at the City responsible for making a stream <br />determination on this site, or determing how the environmentally sensitive/critical areas section of the <br />zoning code wculd apply with respect to buffers, potential relocation, etc. That ��ould be under the <br />purview of your project planner. <br />Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. <br />Thanks! <br />Jane <br />Jane Zimmerman, Sr. Engineer <br />City of Everett Public Works Department <br />phone:425-257-8885 fax:425-257-8882 <br />e-mail: jzimmerman@ci.everett.wa.us <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: James Palda [mailto:jpalda@steadfastcompanies.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 4:18 PM <br />To: Jane Zimmerman <br />Subject: Everett Mall Phase 2- lette� <br />Jane, <br />Attached are two letters from Wetland Resources regarding the detention ponds. <br />The letter dated November 30, 1993 indicates that since the area does not have hydric soils or <br />wetland hydrology, it does not meet the 1989 definition of jurisdictional wetlands. <br />The one dated 1998 goes into detail in the conversation between Wetland Resources and Liz <br />i <br />'s_ , <br />